Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really

A few days ago, I wrote to refute a rumor article, caption is " refute a rumor: Stamp of the Ministry of Public Security, is the country entered " ban raise " times? Do not come with the rumor please flicker farmer " , more than 2000 netizens share a criticism, great majority is to since the country lets raise,say, why to give the piggery of my home even unplugged?

Actually, have two likely, it is your home piggery is belonged to ban the limits that raise an area inside, for instance area of head of mechanism school, fountainhead or the place that residential area population centers quite, this affirmation is to meet by termless demolish.

Because your home is given by local government,another may be " one knife is cut " , although the order had allotted before the country: The requirement ought not to be banned raise cannot ban. But still a few areas go to the lavatory for the graph, adopt what banned directly, tore open simplification means.

Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really cheat?

Of course, still the netizen also expresses, nowadays " expert " too much, various opinion on public affairs have.

For instance brother of netizen @Aaa bee says: These year really funny also, those so called experts. Prohibit the country prepares a feast, prohibit the country burns bavin, burn coal, prohibit raising cattle, fowl, after all is one caboodle prohibits the business that the farmer does! I have offer, prohibit the farmer sells he grows grain, vegetable and fruit, let drink the northweat wind-have nothing to eat of those so called expert go

Really, date of Zhang of new nowadays media is flush, a lot of sousaphones are measured to suck drainage, like the caption that hears with Jing of person of a few be astonished, and an expert is hanged to say on caption, more common, as to what the expert says, anyway also nobody is found out.

Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really cheat?

Today, I am in a certain 3 farming on the sousaphone, discovered party of a caption again, just did not release 3 hours, read a quantity to already was passed 2000, caption is called " on May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! "Ban labour raise " the file already allotted, old farmer: Can farm " .

Be engaged in 3 farming domain article composes nearly 10 years, I must make sure I browse each official website of large government sector the least everyday everyday a hour, it is to do not miss any government of policy announce.

I can be affirmative say, inside these a few years, issue policy without any branch, the requirement prohibits farmer " go out work " , also doing not have any file is " ban labour raise " file;

I can assure, this article is caption party, it is a rumor!

Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really cheat?

Additional, after all my careful content that read this article, I discover full text is article him author up and down a few think foolishly.

E.g. , because rural pollution is serious,the state says in the article, preparation begins big punish one time. Actually, the country had issued several policy about rural environment punish a few this years, release before New Year for instance " 3 Qing Dynasty change " policy, from announce formally up to now, countrywide each district is undertaking continuously, not be the preparation that says in article begins punish at all!

Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really cheat?

The 2nd, article middle finger goes out: In the process that this in the country the environment governs, very much small shop will be very difficult subsist, cause unemployment of a lot of people thereby, this is so called " ban work " .

This also is very funny, because can environmental punish let no less than going to factory of a lot of coolie is vivid? This changes a concept completely secretly namely, only those meetings make the coolie plant that the environment contaminates, just can get the influence of environmental punish, but do you know the small shop of how many the whole nation has? Countless! The small shop that how many has again is close as a result of environmental punish? Reckoning in every item also does not arrive to be become!

Plus go into town now the peasant worker worker that Wu is versed in, how many person can take coolie plant again? Be willing without how many person for certain,

So, apparently " ban work " it is a rumor!

Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really cheat?

Finally, still point out in article: The country tries hard now in punish environment, but sufferred from a lot of common people! This word looks how how incorrect interest, what calls national punish the environment, sufferred from a lot of common people, say so by you, not punish environment, won't suffer from common people?

The country publishs any policy, do not pat a head to come on stage, it is the draft that passes many times discusses, next fair show, advise of the whole people, revise again, again fair show, through several loops ability can come on stage formally, so the country comes on stage 3 farming policy can say is for the farmer.

Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really cheat?

And environmental punish also is to improve rural person to rank an environment, build beautiful appropriate to occupy rural area, the farmer that may have one fraction is affected, but also cannot saying was to suffer from common people.

Is your letter believed? Most common people is willing very much!

Big farming circle is achieved formerly, blame accredit is reprinted surely investigate!

未经允许不得转载:News » Refute a rumor: On May 1 file, the farmer prohibits " go out work " ! Is the farmer so good really