Wu Hechen wife says the fault sets upper limit of raise the wind for target amount, heart cloud company: Company already raise donations. Video / new capital signs up for our video
According to media coverage, on April 8, wu Hechen of actor of comic dialogue of heart cloud company breaks out cerebral hemorrhage and cure of be in hospital, its family is in for its numerous prepare platform " water prepares " on start raise the wind, amount is 1 million yuan. Express according to the family member, at present raise the wind already stopped, up to late on May 3 in all procuration 148 thousand yuan. However, netizen discovery, economic atmosphere does not have Home Wu so poor, there is a two house properties, car in Beijing, be in however numerous when preparing, tick off chose " poverty door " label.
These information overlay rise, caused extensive doubt of the netizen. Zhang Hong of Wu Hechen wife art give out 3 prooves about respect of Wu Hechen belongings and explanation early or late, but controversy still is in continuously. On May 3, "Water prepares " platform shuts this project.
Will tell from legal meaning, the network of Wu Hechen family is numerous chip, although information is released not comprehensive, do not have illegal part however. The origin of this controversy, still depend on a network numerous clew responsibility does not fulfil the venture that plans platform to seek supplementary information to the individual to reach the designated position.
Understand commonly according to social popular, release on the network seek supplementary information, belong to beneficent property appeal. Release on the net seek supplementary information, mean this family to had faced very urgent situation, be in predicament in. And release on platform come out, the descriptive content that means relevant difficult position has platform to regard as in authenticity respect endorse.
Zhang Hong of @ of Wu Hechen wife art small gain responds to cut to pursue.
However, this think run-of-milly, with law regulation and practice operation are having the deviation that comparative.
Basis " beneficent law " spirit, beneficent activity and individual appeal to be distinguished somewhat. Be based on the complexity of the life, the individual is based on what the need in the life gives out to seek supplementary information, the amount is huge, the case is complex, the rigid that law cuts without one knife to this prohibits. The one part that the individual appeals, the butt joint of charitable organization is participated in, charitable organization also carried on to be checked to seeking supplementary information with evaluated blame, this part put under is beneficent activity of the system. And more parts that intervene without charitable organization, belong to an individual to appeal.
The individual appeals to attribute given action in civil action. A person has authority to release hope free to obtain the plea of the help external, someone else decides to whether give money according to his judgement.
Show some to face an individual to offer information to release the platform of network raise the wind of the service, it is the ligament between a person that appeal and helper merely. If not be to appear,forge information, perhaps embezzle other identity releases the illegal action such as false information, whether appeal and help, it is bilateral completely your affection the behavior that I wish.
Wu Hechen appeals the controversy that encounters in case, the biggest question depends on them cancelling the option that chose platform to offer -- " poverty door " , but a lot of people do not think their domestic situation belongs to this one category.
If platform just undertook trying to find out the real intention to condition of Wu Hechen family, be in numerous in preparing message, try to explain, probably controversy can as early as possible put an end to. But in this incident, numerous prepared platform to offer convenient option, fill in a form and submit it to the leadership of the person that went to the lavatory to appeal, also went to the lavatory dedicator is discriminated, did not check the information of the person that appeal however, still do not have special remind a netizen: "Poverty door " label is him initiator only tag, be not the government to maintain, also do not have a course to check.
To the problem between masses acknowledge and essence of platform of network raise donations, " service of platform of public raise donations runs way " the 10th regulation, (platform) ought to undertake to the public in prominent place the risk is on guard clew, inform its information not to attribute information of beneficent and public raise donations, authenticity is in charge of by the individual that releases information.
The regulation of this one clause makes clear the border of responsibility namely. Inside the domain that appeals in the individual, platform does not offer information to check with evaluate a service, need has done sufficient clew to participator. It is besides the responsibility of promulgator, participator also needs to be judged to his and choose to be in charge of.
Those who make a person regretful is, above the risk clew that at present platform seeks supplementary information in the individual, responsibility is fulfilled not completely reach the designated position. Accordingly, contributory one party often is moved easily by story and picture, oversight the responsibility that benefactor individual also needs burden information to check, face the risk that information inaccuracy cuts thereby. Once after the event discovers information has discrepancy, lead to contradictory conflict.
Say so, the information that platform of network raise donations appeals to the individual, must implement legal provision, undertake sufficient risk hints. Otherwise, similar incident still can be performed ceaselessly.
□ Yao Yao (commonweal personage)
