Recently, famous dining-room accused Jiang Mou of Yang Liping company court, yang Liping just thinks, decorate is in the storefront of this dining-room to fall without permissive circumstance, duplicated work of Yang Liping dancing " moon " silhouette graph, made tort conduct, claim for compensation 1 million.
? According to agent introduction of Yang Liping, yang Liping serves as " moon " performer, enjoy " moon " the copyright such as dancing work, silhouette art work.
? And this dining-room do sth without authorization will " moon " silhouette duplicates partition of picture of screen, adornment, dining-room, the conspicuous position that puts park restaurant undertakes revealing, let the public easily think Yang Liping and this dining-room have collaboration or Dai Yan concerns, have the suspicion that borrows Yang Liping's fame to enlarge force, attribute unfair competition action.
? On the court, yang Liping still just was shown " moon " the comparative figure of silhouette and picture of this dining-room adornment, force card the other side is put in tort behavior.
? However the accused just is opposite however Yang Liping square accuse undertook contradictory one by one, they express, regard dish of a Yunnan as the house, silhouette of dance of use Dai nationality serves as adornment, it is to highlight Yunnan place characteristic completely, there also are feature of Yang Liping's full name, appearance and work name inside silhouette, nonexistent tort behavior.
? The 2nd, what dining-room uses is peacock dance classical movement " 3 turns " , attribute the action of public domain, be not Yang Liping original creation.
? And to unfair competition this " boiler " , they also express " do not carry on the back " , they state meal and Yang Liping company do not have the across on any business, does unfair competition say He Lai?
Because both sides is put in controversy in respect of a lot of detail,be probably, this case was not adjudged on the court.
Actually, star shape accuses a businessman to violate effigies right, the case of information of dispersed and false Dai Yan is not little, some platform ever was in the video that Fan Bingbing uses to enter some activity below the circumstance that puts accredit on the ice without Fanbing, just sue by Fan Bingbing, the court adjudicates after, this platform apologizes publicly and recoup each pecuniary loss 150 thousand yuan.
? Compare Fan Bingbing, yang Liping case of this dimension authority is a little special really, because resemble character of the accused place, they did not use opening of Yang Liping's full name, face, chan Ping silhouette is duplicate, with respect to million of claim for compensation, did not encroach effigies to counterpoise it seems that in that way " final " will get conviction making a person.
? Many netizens think dining-room does not have tort, return somebody speak bluntly says Yang Liping is to be in " touch porcelain " , peacock dance had before Yang Liping, does Yang Liping jump does peacock dance calculate do not calculate tort?
? Nevertheless also the netizen expresses to support Yang Liping dimension to counterpoise, say this kind of behavior that hits tort edge ball must get punishing severely!
? Yang Liping regards our country as famous dancing artist, use up lifetime for peacock dance bend, the work silhouette that sees full of painstaking effort is duplicated to become dining-room decorate to taste, her mood still can understand, but the controversy dot of this case is quite much, after all result how, what still should await law is final adjudge.
Can of love story of Aiming of Liu Qingyun Guo calls God drama, marry 21 years if conjugal love is admired first evil spirit other people!
Doubt be exposinged to the sun has Huang Xinying pregnant, ever with Ma Guoming live together partly before marriage, child father is attributive into suspicion in one's mind!
Couple of of article horse Yi attends a party however because of a little movement, be oppugned two people " seemingly in harmony but actually at variance "
