The battle of rash Shanghai controversy is not without solution, "Eightfold lens " but reductive t

Circulate on the football ground a fallacy, "The miscarriage of justice is the one part of football game, also be football glamour place " . This word often is taken by Chinese football use, a when gain profit because of the miscarriage of justice especially. This also is the distress with Chinese the biggest football, treat wrong leakage to sentence, only fall victim one party just can go averment of make a stand against, gain profit to just can choose pretend to be deaf and dumb, a without exception that remain seeing joke. Besides the victim, do not have how many person to be able to care about the truth truly, till them appear when experience is unjust.

The battle of rash Shanghai controversy is not without solution, "Eightfold lens " but reductive truth, sufficient assist should have explained

Lu Neng and go up the battle of harbor, encountered controversy sex is sentenced 3 times punish. After contest, punish through be being sentenced to controversy answer dish, nitty-gritty also happened to invert it seems that: For the first time, the 2nd ball that Gedesi is blown off, jin Jingdao is in offside position really, but he looks to did not disturb Yan Jun approach; The 2nd, jill is blown the goal with invalid offside, in light of the offside line that shows from slow motion, gedesi whether offside existence controversy; The 3rd, the handball inside forbidden zone of Hao Jun Min fouls, although he has handball suspicion really, but useful also hand is dragging Aierkesen intentionally at the back the picture that arm of Hao Jun Min turns toward the ball.

The battle of rash Shanghai controversy is not without solution, "Eightfold lens " but reductive truth, sufficient assist should have explained

Nowadays, support science and technology develops, the mistake is it is OK to confirm by ceaseless by put an end to, VAR just also strides civilized one half step. Cast VAR to let the common fault that the match becomes abrupt, VAR is proved most time is effective. However, if be answered repeatedly,put the dispute that limits very hard? Sentence of heart armour league matches punish, gave out the example like schoolbook.

The battle of rash Shanghai controversy is not without solution, "Eightfold lens " but reductive truth, sufficient assist should have explained

The De Jia penult in not long ago annulus, in the competition that Lai of Bai Ren be a guest compares stannum, doubt of offside goal existence. Below this kind of circumstance, VAR video judgment of De Jia gave out " eightfold lens " those who fall is microscopical the effect, prove Laimoduofusiji puts the offside that is in a few centimeters really. De Jia is sentenced this punish have great draw lessons from a meaning, because much frame, little one frame may be met bring about completely different outcome, this ability is normally of true accord with sentence punish. VAR exceeds in " eightfold lens " , where be again?

The battle of rash Shanghai controversy is not without solution, "Eightfold lens " but reductive truth, sufficient assist should have explained

Sufficient to China assist for, sentence in the light of controversy sex punish, also cannot choose " dissimulate " , every time after controversy appears, publish juridical report in time, let take part in the match player and fan can know the judgment sentences punished reason, just can reduce fan effectively so indissoluble and annoy. Although fall victim one party does not have choice appeal, this also is sufficient assist this responsibility that use up and obligation.

未经允许不得转载:News » The battle of rash Shanghai controversy is not without solution, "Eightfold lens " but reductive t