Before this, a lady bought 18 dress hind in place of the businessman that clean out treasure, without reason in 7 days the requirement inside the deadline that return money returns money, but businessman accident discovers this lady ever was wearing place to buy dress travel to take a picture. After classics media exposure, cause a netizen to pay close attention to extensively.
The Xiaohuang that buy the home, sell Mr Li to still platform of the government that clean out treasure made a response, the thing also tends reconcile.
Be in nevertheless day, of Xiaochi of the merchant that clean out treasure appear, broke coming " halcyon " . Little late for a special purpose hurried to Hangzhou to find group of column of 1818 gold eye from Shanghai, say she has some of circumstance to want report, because of this disturbance that return money, cancel a paragraph of past event that had her.
"Buy 18 dresses to travel regressive goods " after appearing on the network, late young lady also pays close attention to this matter, because she often also is encountered similar and undesirable buy the home. But understand this after the event carefully to just discover suddenly when her, reach its when work shop she discovered merchant plum gentleman 2018, pilfer edition the person of her shop dress!
Late young lady still offerred enough evidence to prove, she designed this clothing 2016, scriptural lower part wrote time to be in July 2016.
On September 24, 2016, late young lady still delivered a small gain, there is this clothes fitly inside.
Late young lady still expresses to choose to phonate now be not for loiter heat, hope everybody borrows this matter attention to borrowed this kind of phenomenon: "Pilfer edition to be being achieved formerly harm is very big for the architect " .
In recent years, presenting swift ascendant state in the case of intellectual property tort of our country happening, in all trades and professions, incident of intellectual property tort often still has happen. Dress design also belongs to intellectual property naturally. But because of its characteristic, the example of the dress patent application that so dress stylist designs him does not see more. But do not do not have intellectual property on behalf of stylist without patent application. Borrowed, copying is tort, this is beyond question.
(content turns from 1818 gold eye)
