Data chart
The citizen buys a website easily to buy earphone of BEATS of blame quality goods in Su Ning, 2 careful press the court " false one compensate 5 " standard, sentence Su Ning to buy compensatory customer easily more than yuan 160 thousand.
On May 12, beijing court rules civil judgment shows the 2 careful that the website announces, citizen bark is such-and-such in Jiangsu Su Ning buys limited company of electronic business affairs easily (next weighing " Su Ning is bought easily " ) of operation " Su Ning buys a website easily " flower 30 thousand multivariate buy 26 BEATS earphone, be maintained by authorization service business these earphone are not quality goods. Beijing 2 adjudgement make court of the first intermediate people sell refund of businessman of thing of square, experience, square, Su Ning buys platform easily by " false one compensate 5 " standard compensation bark is such-and-such 166400 yuan.
From buy earphone to arrive win compensation, last a period of time is close 4 years.
Before this, some puts forward Wang Mou " false one compensate 5 " compensatory appeal did not obtain court of people of division of Haidian of court of first instance, Beijing to support.
July 2015, bark is such-and-such buy a website easily through Su Ning, bought into the limited company of business affairs of electron of Shenzhen state peaceful that is stationed in this website (next weighing " business of state peaceful cable " ) the one model of 26 BEATS that sell earphone, total prices 33280 yuan.
Judgment shows, the bark after receiving money is such-and-such discover acoustic quality is bad, when maintain, the branch after he is made work is informed, earphone blame loads quality goods formerly, cannot guarantee. He satisfies business of Jiang Bangtai cable and Su Ning to be bought easily tell a court, business of cable of appeal state peaceful returns payment for goods and press " false one compensate 5 " standard compensate pays 166400 yuan; Su Ning is bought easily assume implicative liability to pay compensation.
Court of first instance thinks, bark is such-and-such seal off experience case earphone 3; "Su Ning buys a website easily " compensate pays a standard to carry bright, press into the person that be stationed in holiday of businessman carry out to need offset to expend " false one compensate 5 " standard compensate pays, but bark of such-and-such appeal middle finger is business of state peaceful cable serves as " member " ; "Su Ning buys a website easily " regard a service as platform, have no right to take the place of the businessman is made to consumer " false one compensate 5 " acceptance. This court sentences reason 23 earphone that some returns your Wang Mou to did not seal off, business of state peaceful cable returns corresponding payment for goods 29440 yuan; Other appeal does not grant to support.
Bark is such-and-such put forward to appeal subsequently, ask cancel first instance adjudicates.
Cognizance of 2 careful court thinks, wang Mou is put in network shopping contract to concern between some and business of state peaceful cable, the contract is active; Bark some earphone that some receives actually is not former outfit quality goods via examining, the sale action of business of cable of reason state peaceful is formed con. Reason bark is such-and-such return of business of cable of requirement state peaceful is total payment for goods, reason just when, should grant to support.
Cognizance of 2 careful court thinks, "Su Ning buys a website easily " the network that ties You Suning to buy operation easily trades platform, su Ning buys the compensate that announces on this platform easily to pay compensate of clear and sham commodity pays a standard to be in the standard " false one compensate 5 " . Although argue calls his acceptance,Su Ning is bought easily is to replace business of state peaceful cable to be made to consumer, business of Dan Bangtai cable gives deny.
Beijing court of the first intermediate people thinks, cognizance fact of court of first instance is not comprehensive, applicable law is wrong, processing has as a result by accident, this courtyard gives correct.
On April 25, 2019, court of the first intermediate people makes Beijing final judgment court decision: Judgment of cancel first instance; Sentence your Wang Mou some returns experience thing earphone 26; Sentence business of Ling Bangtai cable to return Wang Mou some payment for goods 33280 yuan; Sentence Ling Suning to buy compensatory Wang Mou easily some 166400 yuan.
