"Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness

Meet dispute to want to engage in a lawsuit, evidence is crucial, recording collects card is a good idea, so the issue came. . . . . . Without the recording that the other side agrees with, is there legal effectiveness?

Recording can regard lawsuit as evidence, " code of civil law " the 63rd form that provided 8 evidence, include material of seeing and hearing.

With the recording that legal measure obtains

Can use as evidence

"Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness

Steal the recording of the collection

How does ability serve as legal evidence?

"Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness

"Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness

"Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness

"Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness

"Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness

" a certain number of regulations of top people court about litigant evidence " the 49th regulation, when having qualitative card to data of book card, material evidence, seeing and hearing, the original that party has authority to ask to show evidence original perhaps other people.

Overall for

Steal the recording material of the collection

Cannot violate the following 3 specific requirements

① is not gotten (serious) enroach on others closes right increase;

② is not gotten lawbreaking prohibit sexual regulation;

③ must not violate convention of fine of social public order.

Additional

In obtain recording evidence while

Have evidence of other evidence photograph as far as possible

Prove power in order to enhance its.

Graph article originates network, invade cutout.

未经允许不得转载:News » "Recording " without agreeing, whether have legal effectiveness