Bilateral party concerns because of ending partnership and reach creditor's rights debt to clear an agreement, one party requests to repay of debt, should deny support?
[argument] because bilateral party stops the creditor's rights debt that partnership concerns and manages to clear the agreement of property, between bilateral party generation right obligation concerns, creditor asks debtor fulfils obligation according to the agreement, people court should grant to support.
[analytic] " set " the 15th regulation: "In civilian leasehold dispute, accuser is a basis to mention with the creditor's rights proof such as receipt for a loan, receipt, IOU, affirmatory book civilian leasehold lawsuit, impact of legislation of foundation of the accused basis puts forward counterplea, people court ought to the case fact that the basis finds out, identify the foundation between bilateral party to law concerns and give cognizance. But party passes mediation, reconcile or clear agreement of reached creditor's rights debt, unwell the regulation of the money before using. " accordingly, existence partnership concerns between debt issue party, the creditor's rights debt that accuser manages with both sides liquidates an agreement to be credential to lodge a complaint, the accused advocates law of real department partnership concerns between both sides, nonexistent leasehold fact, be like the case fact that people court basis finds out, after maintaining this to liquidate an agreement to fasten copartner to stop partnership to concern, be opposite the creditor's rights debt that throw the processing of belongings and manages clears an agreement, the accused should grant to repay debt.
