Local time 17 morning, china visits a scholar Zhang Ying glume murders the adjudgement of measurement of penalty of the case to enter end in the United States by staking, whether should both sides dominating debate sentence capital punishment with respect to convict or lifelong imprisonment, must not bail, do Chen Ci of end a case to jury. Accuse to just be when Chen Ci of end a case, be based on chapter home Duan Zhi of hand of female to love great expectations, the accused of reason of square commute a sentence of cruel, argue faint, to jury Chen Qing, proposal " justice must get promoting, give Kelisitengsen to sentence capital punishment " please.
17 early in the morning, the family of Zhang Ying glume reachs a court, chapter mother leaves place after oyer first. Respect of the accused person, parents of the Si Tengsen in the gram also attends front courtyard careful; Kelisitengsen is worn white shirt and deep gray trousers, look to give out a smile to parents from time to time.
In the adjudgement that day, both sides dominating debate puts forward measurement of penalty to consider a factor to jury early or late. In Chen Ci of end a case, zhanmusi Nielsen points out confederative inquisitor: "Because malty wine perhaps distresses to just kill Zhang Ying glume,the accused is not. The accused is for what violate completely enjoy and killed Zhang Ying glume. The accused is for what violate completely enjoy and killed Zhang Ying glume..
Nielsen still tells inquisitor jury, plot beforehand of the Si Tengsen in the accused gram this crime, be opposite before the body of Zhang Ying glume undertakes destroying cadaver destroy the evidence, had undertaken making a person bristle with anger, cruel to its, the action that involves cruel torture. The accused still claims, he is right the processing means of remains of Zhang Ying glume, anybody cannot be found forever.
Nielsen points out inquisitor further, check just is the injured party discovered on the bed of the accused the DNA of Zhang Ying glume. Kelisitengsen sleeps on this piece of bed all the time, be like what thing to did not happen.
Nielsen admits inquisitor, if the accused is sentenced capital punishment, its family can feel distress certainly, but this kind of painful germ, overcome Lisitengsen in what sitting in dock to get on the chair then, he just is this tragic maker. Check just tells jury finally, overcome Lisitengsen to sentence capital punishment to convict only, justice just can be promoted.
In check square after Chen Ci of end a case, counsel for the defence makes a speech. To avoid Kelisitengsen's death penalty, argue just provides the backdrop that convict commits a crime to jury again.
The stepfather of the accused (left) , the mother of the accused (in)
Gram of the name of a river in Shaanxi and Henan provinces of wave of the accused counsel for the defence thinks, although overcame the fault that individual place makes Lisitengsen to cause crime, but argue just reminds jury, the familial invigorative medical history of the accused. Before murdering incident happening, the accused is making a fight with excessive drinking and depressed disease all the time, he ever sought a help for this but did not succeed. Argue just says, lifelong imprisonment already was very severe penalty, all life are commendable, include Kelisitengsen's life.
Family of Zhang Ying glume enters
That day afternoon at 5 o'clock, jury stops to discuss. Jury is in when leaving a courtroom, presented 3 big questions with both sides dominating debate to the judge, the hope gives before final court decision arises clear.
This 3 big questions are:
1. inquisitor is in the reason that points out the accused can become tall dangerous figure to serve as infliction, what whether point to is convict is in jail, still show convict is in innocent when or be when was being captured? The answer gave out after course of both sides dominating debate discusses: It is to be in jail.
2. jury asks, they are in when examining reason of infliction commute a sentence, whether should specific quantify? Simple for give out namely the grading with the what light heavy what of each reason? Accuse the answer that argue both sides gave out to agree.
Whether should 3. jury be show level, can with angle consideration of the individual a certain element make argument of commute a sentence? Both sides dominating debate agrees to refer jury directive, after telling them to there is what factor in affirmatory existence, balance accentuates and reduce a factor again.
Judicial general local time proceed was adjudged at 9 o'clock in the morning July 18 discuss.
