On June 15 afternoon, " Chu Qiao is passed " former writer Xiao Xiangdong, in small gain with respect to work " Chu Qiao is passed " borrowed be related to " madam of bead of a dry measure used in former times " author Xiao Ruse releases an apology to state.
Xiao Xiangdong express: "To borroweding one thing, I make cordial apology here. The caustic estrangement that because this matter gets,came a few years in the past to compensate you is harmed, my general adjudicates according to the court, make due compensation, in deleting a book instantly, borrowed " madam of bead of a dry measure used in former times " content of 15 place character. Be very sorry about the behavior because of me, the reader that lets you and you had very unpleasant experience. My general draws a lesson, always make the mistake such as this no longer, mend one's ways self-communion, write down sincerely constantly. The hope has an opportunity to be able to express regret to you face to face. The hope has an opportunity to be able to express regret to you face to face..
" Chu Qiao is passed " former writer Xiao Xiangdong to " madam of bead of a dry measure used in former times " author Xiao Ruse borroweds reason of be related apology still needs from this month a court decision of 12 days speaks of.
On June 12 " madam of bead of a dry measure used in former times " author Xiao Ruse appeals to " Chu Qiao is passed " author Xiao Xiangdong tort holds water, decide result, the accused Xiao Xiangdong need to be deleted inside formulary time " Chu Qiao is passed " in the content of 15 place tort that involves, the press needs to stop to publish the books that contains tort content, ask Xiao Xiangdong be in 10 days continuously its Guan Weixiao makes an apology to Xiao Ruse on Hunan wax gourd. Still need to recoup cost of etc of Xiao Ruse pecuniary loss, aggregate nearly 50 thousand yuan.
As this tort case ring down the curtain, " Chu Qiao is passed " borrowed be related thes whole thing comes to light eventually. And other work borroweds tort case still is on the road, allow to weigh and the path is far. Last month, novel of full length anti-corruption " camera bellows " author Liu Santian still releases week of Mei Sen to be in on the net work " people's name " in involve the content that borrowed, and he will not hesitate all cost continue appeal goes down.
" camera bellows " author Liu Santian claims, according to oneself the job is experienced, began to write novel of full length anti-corruption 2004 " camera bellows " , this work last a period of time 6 years long, published formally in January 2011, numerous trouble was given during creation.
2017, as teleplay " people's name " heat is sowed, herself is watched carefully, think this drama and novel " camera bellows " height of core incident, narrative structure is approximate, and appeared be in story bridge Duan Lei to be the same as more, figure relationship is designed almost exactly like.
Can maintain week of Mei Sen to be in almost " people's name " in form borrowed me-too fact. Liu Santian reachs Mei Sen of along with week 7 to manufacture jointly the person encroachs its copyright to tell a court, and ask novel " people's name " issue 18 million yuan to wear and recoup pecuniary loss in the round.
On November 1, 2017, liu Santian is sued to Pudong court begin, this tort case early or late open a court session is adjudged. On December 27, 2018, shanghai Pudong court hears this case publicly, the result is accuser the view encroachs copyright to do not have fact and legal basis, this academy does not grant to support.
After the event, zhou Mei dark turns over a Liu Santian to tell a court. The thing has not been over, when " people's name " after conflagration, " defend of life and death " author Li Xia accuses week Mei Sen again court, and pecuniary loss of claim for compensation 800 thousand yuan. Final, the court adjudicates the whole suit that rejects Li Xia requests.
But, li Xia refuses to obey result of this one court decision, appeal goes to Beijing intellectual property court, court decision of requirement cancel first instance, change the original sentence supports his entire lawsuit request. The thing arrived the 2 careful later, namely we see trial result nowadays, still with Li Xia lose a lawsuit, Zhou Mei wins the lawsuit greatly and end.
At this point Li Xia still does not stop, make a speech wantonly on the network, call week of Mei Sen crooked dissembler, dare not appear in court. Oneself prepare to file appeal the 3rd times.
How can the business grow finally, still remain to observe, be worth what carry is, when does this circle turn into whose fire do I accuse who?
Still visit the law of the land? Still have law? Who to still have?
