The house has this problem property unexpectedly without giving thought to, is owner still necessary

Common occurance of incident of owner dimension authority, the majority reason in dispute is the pay that expends with property relevant. And this one phenomenon is expended in property of owner refus capture big much there is good reason for it. For instance craze of wall of building inside and outside, housetop, ceiling, outside window of wall ooze water, door is out of shape etc the bequeath problem such as project quality is pendent all the time, so, the behavior that owner thinks refus capture property is expended is manage place ought to. But is the argument of these refus capture legal really? Why does owner dimension authority discover however to finally often things go contrary to one's wishes?

The house has this problem property unexpectedly without giving thought to, is owner still necessary is pay property expended?

Owner rights and interests

From legal laws and regulations angle looks, according to " property regulation " , " property serves a contract " relevant provision: Property management is to point to owner to share the joint management that building, place, establishment shares inside part and building division into districts to perhaps entrust property to serve person of enterprise, other government to divisional and all building mutual to owner building, establishment, equipment, .

The categorical mix mix that major owner serves property with development business in reality, the service of property and building project quality are existing the distinction of substaintial sex, property concerns to serve a contract between service company and owner, and concern of contract of commodity house business is between development business and owner, the problem such as building quality belongs to owner and the category that develop the contract of commodity house business between business, the property of property company collection is not included in cost guarantee period the project upkeep costs inside. Owner already was enjoying property to serve a circumstance to fall, must fulfil its obligation, on time property of pay of full specified amount serves cost. Accordingly, building quality problem cannot make the argument that property of owner refus capture expends. Owner does not have cost of property of warrant refus capture, property company can counterpoise through program dimension of lawsuit.

The house has this problem property unexpectedly without giving thought to, is owner still necessary is pay property expended?

Owner rights and interests

On building quality problem, it is OK that property also just is not outside place oneself thing, after owner feedback problem, property just should be coordinated actively, supervise and urge development business has repair in time to bequeath engineering issue. Solve property to expend dispute to need owner and property company both sides to understand each other. Regard owner as one party, want witting and relevant law, statute, know the content of property management and range correctly, enjoying while property serves the right, what also must fulfill property to serve what the contract sets to hand in property to expend is compulsory.

未经允许不得转载:News » The house has this problem property unexpectedly without giving thought to, is owner still necessary