Gu Amo
According to Taiwan media " Dong Senxin is heard " reported on June 9, of net red Gu Amo " X minute see XX movie " series film meets with water conformity, KKTV 5 piece business is carried tell film origin tort, 7 days of check just are depended on disobeying the law that make power to sue Gu Amo, his friend thanking a surname holds a colleague concurrently, state to media the indictment had be notted receive, had not discussed with the lawyer next, whether to after sueing, suspend making movie by? He expresses all as usual, insist to be created continuously.
Him Gu Amo does not want to make a response more to be being sued, issue 237 words statement, "Give priority to in order to state. " nevertheless film origin is oppugned, still insist to make film, noodles or vermicelli made from bean or sweet potato starch continuously however only as usual is run, a bit is insusceptible.
Image sound is strung together shed platform KKTV to broadcast solely Han drama " W two worlds " , be told with a few minutes by Gu Amo however, the number is watched on implicative influence line, content and business affairs grow Dennis to express to media, although KKTV also has not obtain an indictment, be informed Gu Amo to be sued nevertheless, the mood is obtained of course gently, "Gu Amo may not know he is offended go up to be bothered how oldly, because his film did not set demarcate Taiwan to watch, hong Kong, Korea has copyright, the sea is ab extra accuse really time-consuming bad news money, just do not accuse now, future is seen by discovery the other side can be carried (accuse) just. Future is seen by discovery the other side can be carried (accuse) just..
Oneself are informed the controversy that make power at media one case, be sued by arrange of Taipei ground check. Like that because have not obtain an indictment, accordingly cannot specific response.
Oneself at investigating in, had defined to inquisitor the hair of the course that film produces and originality thinks, also put forward England, United States to should be belonged to about 2 creation reasonable use position.
Accordingly, be sued to this matter, oneself feel very be surprised different and regret. Future will continue safeguard this person rights and interests through judicatory program, and this case is an industry inside first, adjudicate result certainly will matters to whole market modes of life and relation to their environment, the person that affect the creation, creative work that humorous copy makes 2 times directly did not come in the development space of Taiwan, because this oneself will strive for the development space of the industry more actively, also expecting the protection that make power can can adjust because of the changes of in season generation somewhat.
