This world, flicker is too much. Open a series here, talk about the legal big flicker that Ka Youchang sees.
One of flicker: Exercitation period opens accident of half hang out, insurance company rejecting claims is illegimate, this compensate
Its conclusion is broad love to see and hear blocking friend, and the give evidence of report check scheme that has a court, so mutual transmit, circulate on the net very wide. The truth if why? If sheet adjudicates from the court the result will look, I am OK also adduce a lot of counterexample, proving insurance company rejecting claims is lawful. Than court of people of division of mouth of rainbow of city of as above sea (2015) rainbow civilian 4 (civilian) first word the 335th civil judgment, the Ka Youke that have fun at gets online with oneself look up.
Actually sheet does not have too much meaning quite from the amount. Say this view is flicker, have the following reason:
The first, it tells you conclusion only, and did not tell you reason.
This is having trap on logic. For instance I tell you June 1 is the Children's Festival, this conclusion is correct. But I tell you " June 1 is the Children's Festival, because I set,that is. " is this argument absurd? Ka Youyi eye is OK get behind. But " exercitation period opens accident of half hang out, insurance company rejecting claims is illegimate, this compensate " pitfall is so not obvious. If truer if, the court adjudicates insurance company this compensate, because exercitation period opens accident of half hang out,not be with respect to this compensate, however because of other reason, did not write in insurance disclaimer for instance, without special clew, etc. This ability is real reason. is not exercitation period opens accident of half hang out with respect to this compensate.
On logic, this is conclusion correct (insurance company this compensate) , reason mistake (exercitation period opens accident of half hang out with respect to this compensate) .
The 2nd, exercitation period leaves to be hanged partly is code place illicit behavior, not be the regulation of the Ministry of Public Security.
The card says, exercitation period cannot leave to be hanged partly, it is the regulation of the Ministry of Public Security, the regulation of the Ministry of Public Security is not legal laws and regulations, disable so. And of pretend to be serious about sth moved the Ministry of Public Security " motor vehicle driver's license explain get and use a provision " clause, " legislative law " the clause will prove. Masses eating melon by flicker. But it looks to you, it is one part of law only, not be all. Get you in desert just like it, tell you " this is the earth " , somebody believed. But if get you to the side of the sea, can be you still believed?
The truth is exercitation period cannot leave to be hanged partly, it is administrative regulations of the State Council " law of safety of transportation of road of People's Republic of China carries out byelaw " of the 22nd the 3rd section provision " motor vehicle drives the person is inside exercitation period... driving motor vehicle does not get drawing trailer. " the regulation of the Ministry of Public Security just repeated code just.
On logic, this cries " in order to slant without exception complete " .
The 3rd, forensic court decision may be based on a variety of reasons, experience cannot duplicate.
If inquire the court adjudicates, can discover, be in the place of law flourishing, the court supports exercitation period to open accident insurance of half hang out mostly not compensate. And be in the place that likes a try to mediate differences at the sacrifice of principle, anyway insurance company does not need money, the court sentences compensate. This and a law level of the place, society environment, humanitarian consciousness are concerned. It is OK to make a case discuss only so, if take the court decision of armour ground mechanically to second ground, say with the judge " you see a family be sentenced how " be afraid the effect is not apparent.
In the meantime, legal laws and regulations is edited possibly at any time, take the regulation previously to go judgment present problem is inappropriate.
On logic, this cries " empiricism " .
Talk about this problem, it is to see some blocks friend by flicker, think exercitation card opens accident of half hang out to have insurance manage compensate, result insurance rejecting claims, oneself do not have money compensate, the policeman as string of 1 again card, taking printed card to call bad luck to bring a lawsuit against everywhere, very pitiful. To prevent this kind of situation, close-up this article.
Actually a word can avoid the happening of the problem: Exercitation card does not leave hang.
It is so simple.
