Court of people of banyan river county " refus hold blame " typical case

Court of people of banyan river county " refus hold blame " typical case

Bright refus does not carry out Wang Mou case of court decision, ruling

Court of people of banyan river county is dealing with Shang Mou some application carries out Wang Mou dispute of bright business contract in one case process, wang Mou of person be executived bright the obligation that determines because of copy clerk of law of refus nonperformance become effective, be suspected of refus carrying out blame of forensic court decision, ruling to be turned over lawfully by court of people of banyan river county put on record of public security mechanism is investigated.

[basic details of a case] 2016, wang Mou of person be executived bright (department Jiangxi saves a person) contract banyan river county river to octavo 321 nations line transforms edge project, because construction needs, wang Mou Ming Xiangshang is such-and-such buy project place to require data, because default material money 2791 yuan long outstanding, classics for many times after dun is invalid, soup is such-and-such Wang Mou bright appeal to to court of people of banyan river county. On September 22, 2017, court of people of banyan river county adjudicates Wang Mou bright need to Shang Mou some pays material money 2791 yuan. Because of Wang Mou bright miss, service of prefectural court announcement judgment, judgment produced legal effectiveness on January 15, 2018, wang Mou bright did not fulfil obligation after adjudicating become effective. On April 12, 2018, court of people of county of river of such-and-such Xiang Rong applies for soup to be carried out compulsively.

[executive process] morrow of put on record, court of people of banyan river county barks to person be executived through the short message some bright service belongings of executive advice note, report makes, requirement Wang Mou bright fulfilling legal obligation and the belongings state that report to this academy its come nearly one year instantly, but Wang Mou bright did not report according to the requirement belongings circumstance, also did not fulfil the obligation with affirmatory copy clerk of become effective law. During carrying out, because be carried out,bright person is in person Wang Mou other place, to the court executive job does not grant to pay attention to, executive judge calls via be being used for many times, the form such as the letter that send variety informs Wang Mou bright the law that copy clerk of law of repudiate become effective defines to obligation ought to be assumed is sequential, undertake thought education and advise to its, ask its fulfil obligation, but Wang Mou bright think " this case money is little, jiang Youyuan leaving banyan, the court takes me to do not have method " , and threaten says to carrying out a judge, your court can come Jiangxi province catchs a person wait defy the language that carry out, the manner is very abominable. Classics inquiry, bright under one's name has Wang Mou of person be executived 5 water chestnut car of grand light card and car of east wind card each one. This academy thinks, according to relevant provision, wang Mou bright behavior belongs to refus not to carry out become effective court decision, refus not to report the behavior of personal property, fine 5000 yuan decision at was being made to its on August 30, 2018 then. After deciding book service, wang Mou bright still copy clerk of law of repudiate become effective determines obligation. On September 4, 2018, court of people of banyan river county Wang Mou of person be executived bright refus does not carry out forensic court decision, ruling relevant testimony material moves lawfully put on record of public security bureau of county of river sending banyan is investigated, make be chased after on the net to its escape, on September 18, 2018, wang Mou bright by force of pressure, save a criminal give himself up to the police of police station of bridge of filial piety of the city that stroke a city actively to confess one's crime to Jiangxi, fulfilled total obligation and pay amerce. Current, this case is being dealt with by order of law of according to of public security mechanism.

[typical meaning] " China people civilian republican criminal law " the 313rd " capable to the court decision of people court, ruling to carry out and refus is not carried out, the clue is serious " case, be found out lawfully criminal responsibility. In this case, wang Mou of person be executived bright after executive advice note and report belongings are being given out to make to its in the court, in the circumstance that fulfills ability falls, reject a report its belongings circumstance, what copy clerk of law of refus nonperformance become effective decides is compulsory, escape carry out, ill-mannered. This proposal explains consciousness fulfills become effective to adjudicate adequately is every citizen the legal obligation that answers, what court decision of people court become effective, ruling decides is compulsory, no matter money is much money is little, be apart from far and near, must fulfill, will get otherwise legal punish. Deal with of this case lawfully promoted social healthy atmosphere, safeguarded legal honor, had better caution effect.

Court of people of banyan river county " refus hold blame " typical case

? Banyan river is released

Court of people of banyan river county " refus hold blame " typical case
未经允许不得转载:News » Court of people of banyan river county " refus hold blame " typical case