Is urgent arbitration who won after all? Who does the arbitration expend to go out, whether does give arbitral cost to be equal at losing a lawsuit? Be aimed at these problems, company of AI finance and economics connects a line the advanced and advisory Li Yan of office of golden stage attorney is loose.
Li Yan pine expresses: Old Gu You is changed secretly concept and disrelish sophisticatedly. Two views that FF offers did not win support, according to normally semantics understands, it is the meaning that lose a lawsuit. Laogu must emphasize legal level doing not have victory and defeat, such statement is likely misdirect public.
On October 27, laogu releases official statement to allege again through FF oneself " win the lawsuit in the round " . A legal group public figure expresses, urgent arbitration is formal arbitration before temporarily aid helps measure, the purpose is to be in appeal to bilaterally beg between search a balance, reject what harm interest of the other side badly to appeal to beg, can not be opposite bilateral whether break a contact gives a ruling, say in jural nonexistent triumph. Accordingly, arbitral front courtyard rejected Laogu to put forward " the application that big financing of thoroughly privative constant agrees with to counterpoise " and " remove the new application of hypothec of constant big capital fund " , allow him to undertake the financing of strict requirement counterpoises having only.
So, laogu emphasizes him arbitration winning the lawsuit again, it is the trick of public of confuse right and wrong, promiscuous seeing and hearing, misdirect nevertheless. Compare this funny statement, the constant big announcement that needs to assume legal responsibility is apparent reliability is much higher.
