On November 30, 2018, the accuser poplar that by top people court court of the 5th circuit tries is such-and-such appeal to the accused Guizhou contract of business of limited company of service of some car sale " con " dispute case makes 2 careful final judgment adjudicate: Cognizance the accused of first instance of senior people court forms cancel Guizhou Province " con " sentence your the accused returns the money that buy a car to accuser and the 3 times first instance that compensates for 16.5 million yuan adjudicates; Behavior of cognizance the accused is not formed " con " , the angle that counterpoises from know the inside story of enroach on consumer drinks calm the accused compensates for accuser 110 thousand yuan, the majority lawsuit cost that accuser bears a this case first instance, 2 careful is total more than yuan 30. So far, this inside car line of business and even what cause tremendous echo socially is so-called " history on the most expensive retreat one compensate 3 cases " end eventually, fall next heavy curtain.
Top people court is in court decision of this case final judgment to including: How to maintain " consumer rights and interests protects a law " of the 2nd regulation " the life consumes need " ; How to maintain " consumer rights and interests protects a law " of the 55th regulation " con " ; Carry out " con " the time node that the information in the process informs; "Consumer know the inside story counterpoises " in operator is had to which kinds of information legal those who tell obligation limit; Flaw of car lacquer face reachs his to handle this kind of information and Chinese steam wagon flow to connect association to release " serve by the examination before with the car new car makes work how-to (try out) " (the following abbreviation " PDI is how-to " ) applicable; "Know the inside story of enroach on consumer counterpoises " of liability to pay compensation drink calm element involve consumption " con " the concerned core of dispute and focal law problem made detailed juridical argue and analysis elaborate.
In process of this case cognizance, limited company of service of some car sale applies for the accused Guizhou lawfully Chinese steam wagon flow connects association to appear in court as guild to concerning major item undertakes demonstrative, top people court allows and to Chinese car current association is given out " appear in court advice note " . Chinese steam wagon flow understands the association requirement according to the court, sell the management consciousness with domain sincere letter, normative operator to raise a car further, popularize automobile industry PDI to concern professional knowledge to social community, cogent the legitimate rights and interests that defends consumer, accreditation expert attended careful of this case front courtyard, party of both sides of judge of top people court, former defendant was accepted to concern the inquiry of professional matters concerned with respect to automobile industry PDI in front courtyard careful, to automobile industry PDI the property of peculiar rite, purpose, content, flow, information tells industry of this one automobile wait for a respect to undertake professional specification, connect association to was released on March 10, 2017 to flowing by Chinese car " PDI is how-to " in the certain state that ought to have announcement to consumer and standard undertook elaborating an analysis adequately.
Additional, society opens to Chinese steam wagon flow in the report that makes to this case in top people court " PDI is how-to " made positive assessment, maintain clearly " reach its to handle about flaw of car lacquer face. To similar message, the person that operator can be based on commerce to judge offset to expend gives inform, with the information of more normative, higher rate exposure promotes his long-term commercial competition ability. In fact, chinese steam wagon flow connects association to make " how-to " already gave to this guide " , this also is top people court action of guild of play of current to Chinese car association makes " PDI is how-to " the judicatory that regards an industry as autonomic standard is approbated.
Because this case is countrywide limits inside what by top people court careful writtens guarantee the first is car consumption domain not only and be domain of whole society consumption " con " dispute case, this proposal court decision will be right car consumption domain and even whole society will consume a domain henceforth " con " measure of applicable, judgment has the law of the case important case is directive meaning, in the meantime, the case that this case will regard a milepost as type on phylogeny of Chinese automobile industry is record in annals.
The east wind that this judicatory of top people court adjudicates have the aid of, let all of us hand in hand the car consumption environment with joint efforts favorable creation, car that maintains harmony consumes order.
