What this problem carries is good. Copy calligraphy sets an example, both neither resembles also forbidding, in the final analysis is the classical to calligraphy understanding that use a pen has serious flaw.
Why classical calligraphy work can have our copy understand the serious problem that go up
This problem itself is very complex. But, our substantially can be divided for two kinds of circumstances.
One kind is meaning face.Some calligrapher are in copy is classical when calligraphy work, be used to the methodological copy according to oneself, such copy method, actually, the calligraphy from him is illuminative, with respect to correct without calligraphic of a study theory. Or, after learning a post, it is the basic calligraphy or drawing according to this one post forever, learn calligraphic.
For instance, what learn at the beginning is Yan Zhenqing, learn tablet inscriptions of the Northern Dynasties later, result study tablet inscriptions of the Northern Dynasties is moment, still be habit of calligraphy or drawing.
Be inferior to saying, of study is Tang Jie, Zuo of copy Zhao the first month also uses Tang Jie's stroke.
In fact, he should not learn even Yan Zhenqing's calligraphy or drawing.
Or, what learn at the beginning is tablet inscriptions of the Northern Dynasties, learn Wang Xi again later, result, he still learns Wang Xi according to tablet inscriptions of the Northern Dynasties.
We call method of this kind of copy chronic copy.Carry oneself habit into calligraphy of new law note copy, in the final analysis, it is the research that lacks pair of calligraphy or drawing.
All calligraphy work, have oneself stroke. Study calligraphy, must can know these distinction, in the meantime, can set an example come out, this ability is the proof that highlights his to explain ability to book legal principle truly.
Meaning facing is method of a kind of copy, but, cannot intention faces the ignorance that masks classical to calligraphy calligraphy or drawing.
If intention faces the error that covers understanding of pair of calligraphy or drawing, be pair of calligraphy study then deceived oneself as well as others.
Before calligraphy copy, we are very insignificant.
The research that the 2nd kind of circumstance is pair of calligraphy or drawing does not have scientific basis.Calligraphy study is a science. This is the view of our modern. Ancient time is nonexistent problem of science study calligraphic.
Why? Because of the study system of archaic person, be called " comprehension " study system. What cries " realize " ? It is yourself goes wanting.
You think, I do not understand originally, also won't think, you call me to want, do I think so?
So, method of this kind of study, successful rate is very low. Because, great majority person is " want " do not come out, but, you also cannot eliminate to extremely individual person was thought out really!
Because have extremely one of the person can be thought out, prove so " realize " it is reasonable.
Where is method of so contemporary study?
Contemporary study method is a logic confirms a method.Learn calligraphy for instance, how to use a pen so, can you have such effect?
This needs to confirm. So, calligraphic study method also entered a new era.
But, current, to new study method, not quite mature still, so, also do not have uniform study standard, accordingly, current calligraphy teaching in home learns, major person or the teaching method of majority person, remain chronic copy means.
So, not only that post go to school that he studies the earliest must not be very picture, learn other post more unlike, this is an inevitable result. And the phenomenon that also is not individual person.
