Shenzhen international furniture exhibits the spot, 2 everybody reside a brand to start pair of war, quick China accuse a brand of first-class stateroom cabin of Hua Shi of the Zhi below the banner to complain Gu Jiajia to reside structural patent tort, its are exhibited 2 reveal a product to be suspected of tort, and to exhibit meeting station of intellectual property protection referred litigant application material. And after 3 hours, the household that visit the home releases a specification, denounce the other side makes sale stunt, manage what disturb a partner normally.
Both sides sticks to his argument, after all whether tort? Decide result how? Just, happy house finance and economics exhibits understanding of intellectual property station to complain incident to Shenzhen international furniture newest decide result, the response says: Of short duration cannot decide whether to form tort, proposal both sides takes formal law course.
Now (on March 21) afternoon, quick China the company is released " about quick China the company exhibits the statement that invents patent dimension authority in Shenzhen international furniture " , on March 20 quick China company (brand of Huashi of the Zhi below the banner) exhibit in Shenzhen international furniture to intellectual property the station complains Gu Jiasha hair to be suspected of tort Zhi Hua Shigong can the incident of sofa invention patent did official government to reply.
Say in statement, this is quick China the company defends oneself intellectual property lawfully lift legally, also be to answer exhibit can sponsor square " esteem property right, protection is achieved formerly, encourage innovation " proper act.
On March 20, after referring lawsuit about 3 hours, the hair outside the household that visit the home " about quick China the circumstance that accuse Gu Jiajia lives patent matter explains " , put forward in the specification, be suspected of the exterior designing patent to be quick China the company applied for 2010, patent date is " ZL201030677088.3 " quick China the company designs patent to evaluate a report at applying for the exterior to bureau of national intellectual property 2015, bureau of national intellectual property issue " exterior design patent evaluates a report " conclusion is: "Entire surface design does not accord with accredit patent condition " .
Additional, consider a household to put forward, this case and 2014 quick China the company sues Gu Jiajia to reside the exterior to design patent tort be exactly the same, its purpose depends on considering a household to sue to the near future quick China the response of additionally two company patent cases, it is production sale stunt on the other hand, manage what disturb a partner normally.
Explain to visit the home textual cut pursues external below:
Le Jucai makes progress via will paying close attention to incident continuously.
