Wu Guanjun: Trustful value breaks his promise with what game theory perspective falls castigatory sy

On March 20, 2019, in Hua Dong Normal University graduate student tells knowledge class " academic standard and academic ethics " on, mr. Wu Guanjun did a problem to be " scientific research sincere letter and ethics of pursue one's studies " report, examine minutely from academic angle why sincere letter is so vital. The lecture arranges existing writings word to stalk of grain by fourth Hong Ran, proofread via check and approve of Mr. Wu Guanjun.

Wu Guanjun: Trustful value breaks his promise with what game theory perspective falls castigatory system

Raphael " Athenian institute "

Detonated an abroad news March 15: Osaka university publishs the findings about cover of auspicious of deceased professor the Qin Dynasty, claim its are in concoctive observation data, divert exists in the paper about shake of Japanese ursine this locality the problem such as the observation record that other orgnaization is choosing otherly, already started a paper to remove add of turn around and stretch out one's hand now. From inside this one news we see, to learned existence problem find out and won't stop because of the die of party, serve as a scholar when you so, when the science that develops you in you studies, everything of all these should be put in yours to think in. This meets the young professor that makes a contribution somewhat probably originally, because appeared to violate the thing of academic ethics in published paper, so that make a life,differ completely.

Same, advanced paragraph time had to detonate us the important matter affection that whole and gregarious media encircles -- Di Tianlin does not know to know paper of net, doctor to borrowed be related. Because of this one incident, make sincere letter problem makes academic standard, scientific research the heat that a the whole people pays close attention to, actually we know, report reportorial scientific research scandal is not little also before, but its influence just is inside academic circle. In whole learning the circle has been changed by the brim today, scholastic consequence stars not as good as far little fresh pork, if because Ditian faces this issue,not be,I am thinking, sincere letter problem just still may be in scientific research the thing inside academic circle.

Confront these phenomena, we must think, what problem did our academic mechanism produce after all? About wanting this topic that discuss today, a lot of student union ask, a what new idea can you still tell to come? We know, the sincere letter of scientific research is the thing of a bottom line actually, all of us knows he is very important, in recent years the country also pays close attention to this one problem more and more, top layer ever innovated in countrywide science and technology the many circumstances such as congress, academician congress speak of scientific research problem of morality of sincere letter, science, also emphasize in 19 big reports put forward to want to advance sincere letter to build a system to change. A society should pay attention to sincere letter be as good as one's word, scientific research is it the basiccest, field that provides example sex most, scientific research domain is the one side mirror that we see this society. Besides, sincere letter also is the cornerstone that science and technology innovates, if do not guard the bottom line of sincere letter, all innovation is unfounded.

The Ministry of Education end 2018 held the meeting that sincere letter builds scientific research of a special delibrate in Xiamen university, the content of sex of a lot of creed put forward on the meeting. We can agree with these views, but why can since is everybody agreed with,you still have so many academic dishonourable action? Here we do not make moral assessment first, examine minutely however from academic angle, why sincere letter is such important. Understood this, you may understand why to cannot be done more have the thing that violates sincere letter.

What Is Trust?

About " What Is Trust " this problem, german sociologist George Simmel has had a such analysises " A State Of Mind Somewhere Between Knowing And Not-knowing " , he mixes sincere letter issue directly our understanding joins, this is a very important hole sees -- be in know with do not know between, in such condition, you just need credit of sincere letter, need. He is farther respecting, know everything when a person, he does not need other group to him sincere letter, because right now of the other side not sincere letter is affected without what to him; But actual condition is, we do not know a lot of things, this society is the person composition that by us these do not have method to know all things, so we are going up somehow believe other, sincere letter is become appeal to necessarily beg, if we choose not to believe, so we must kiss all previous every thing ability goes knowing them. Say so, sincere letter knows the thing with the mainest level namely.

Go further, we can be entered discuss, what problem can choice accredit have? The knowledge that becomes us is the word that is base with sincere letter, mean accept a risk when we choose to believe (the risk that is betrayed especially) , when when me the choice believes some restaurant and sitting to have a meal, I am about to accept it to may be put in epinosic risk; The boy friend that believes you when you is a good man is not broken bits male when, so you also are to assuming a risk: The mobile phone that turns over him when you looks, the story may be additionally one kind of situation; Believe when you a researcher goes citing his document and data, you also are assuming the risk that he may forge. So accredit is not the arrangement of a flawless, had inside our society " accredit " , we must want to accept the risk of its backside. The society that becomes us is built on sincere letter when, we prepare us place accredit is reliable to seeming: The data that this researcher gives out is reliable, this restaurant is reliable, it is reliable that this schoolboy looks at your eye to say I love you all one's life. To us each live in the person in the society that is basis with sincere letter, want to accept a risk, expect opposite party at the same time can reliable.

We go further divisional about " accredit " classification. I cite a case again, when we are away on official business, if I request my friend to help me,attend my dog, I am the meeting that believes him so do, but here has a risk -- he can forget likely take care of a dog this thing. Of course, in this society, the plan that also one kind replaces a gender -- I and he signed about attending the agreement of my dog, the friend that then sanction of a kind of law forces me so do, need not fear it whether believe those who had gotten to think about him is risk, OK also to whether believe those who had gotten to think about him right now exeunt. But we discover, a lot of in the life up, if greatly small business writes contract of a law, social cost can have very tall. In the plan that we still want to return George Simmel place to say: I choose to believe, the choice assumes a such risks. But, there still is here very small divisional, if I think I this friend is a person that forgets a thing very easily, taking care of a doggie I may choose not to believe him on this thing, but I still trust in other side he; If he insists to say he can have been done, if I decide finally also to let him take care of this dog, so I expect in adventure he won't make me disappointed namely. This kind of practice is in learned we say for " cure accredit " , I am expecting in future you won't make me disappointed. Say on this meaning, accredit is us when getting along with other important face.

Trustful value

Next, where do we analyse trustful value to be in after all? Look in me at least, good society is run in, accredit is premise. If we take off accredit from inside the society, we will not cooperate with others, because if you choose,do not believe, you can discover you can have done the business in him hand far from, you need to cost many time to understand the other side to had done his business, the cost of such collaboration is too high. So no matter how, we are unthinkable a world that did not trust.

Go to again pusher, sincere letter can say the sex of a basis that is political wisdom contrive and invent. The person lives together with the means of community, how forming a community is all politics philosophy most the problem of basis sex. The life of a person does not need sincere letter, but facing a the biggest problem with community means life when us -- cooperate between main body build, community should seek the thing of the basis sex of facilitating collaboration namely, is not to be immersed in the person that says like Hobbes the war to the person, because like sincere letter this is planted,comprise the augment of the thing of the basis sex of community just about, just make community OK and ceaseless expand, form civilization finally.

Say palpability early in the Yalishiduode before 2000, actually person and animal do not have what difference, it is the person can have political wisdom only, if leave a town,returning can living person or is god, or it is animal. The Xun Zi of about the same contemporaneity also has said " person can group, those cannot group. " if we sincere letter as a the basiccest politics wisdom, we can understand why we can form civilization. Can choose to cooperate when us when, we just began to have ceaseless development, if we throw away these wisdom entirely, we place remnant very few. One layer upon layer push downward, we can obtain sincere letter to civilized base on this one administrative levels.

In intellectual construction why is sincere letter very vital? Intellectual construction is not 9 the individual's things, again outstanding scholar also is see in the hole of someone else and oneself made on the foundation of research a few push the work, the scholar in academic organizational system and the distinction of civilian sagacious depend on former it is Putting " Minds " Together, and latter criterion apt claims oneself a person solved cosmic big problem. Do not have cooperative process so, knowledge goes very hard forth. Actually, when we discuss civilized development, already set the sex between main body beforehand, you need someone else and you to work together, we form a resultant force together, and this join forces needs sincere letter ability to spread out.

Yasibeiersi offers the view of axes times, each civilization erupt greatly in this time, confucius, father, Socrates, Yalishiduode... but don't have clever person before them? The answer is negative, there is clever person likewise before them, these people have a lot of idea likewise, but after these people die, its thought with respect to annihilate. is in axes times, we discover suddenly, the means that the mankind cooperates formed an order, the word of Confucius his student union writes down his, Plato can write down the word of his teacher, formed the pattern that a knowledge transfers so. Knowledge delivers most foundation a bit, need Putting of collaboration, need namely " Minds " Together, each are in learned accomplish somewhat, the person that stands to the stage that receive award must realise soberly, this is the result of a flock of person join forces.

In the Me Too motion last year, expose to the sun come out of 9 professors without heart behavior, but they make however whole learning circle is facing suspicion and challenge. Produced so eventful feeling last year, each appears once the celebrity with social favorable opinion is pulled down altar, we make moral assessment ceaselessly, be exploded to expect the words and deeds that come out decides afresh through them they are good person or hellion after all. But rare however person thinks truly, these are by judge " bad " what did the person bring to this society after all.

China's devoted and many natural resources builds the world's first-rate education system, begin emulative industry and scientific research, remarkable success was gained in the domain such as network computer, clean the sources of energy and martial technology, but domestic and international scholar expresses, one fraction researcher lacks sincere letter, block up Chinese latent capacity, damaged the collaboration between Chinese scholar and international scholar. Of 9 people not sincere letter, of the influence is circle of whole China learning.

Below game theory perspective break one's promise castigatory system

We turn again a perspective will think with game theory, why sincere letter will be so vital. Game theory has a premise, it thinks everybody is rational, in academic field inside the country we can say a lot of people are reason, even if is those abandoning learning the person of sincere letter. Since you are rational person, the alternative that why increase of sincere letter seek abandons after your reason thinks can be very stupid thing?

In game theory, want to build authentic sex namely above all, you and anybody cooperate, others should feel you are authentic above all, continue of relevant activity ability spreads out. So, how to establish trust with stranger? If you do not have otherwise to build authentic sex, the pattern that establishs the most effectively then, namely " Burning The Bridge " , cut off oneself a way of escape, reach condemnatory advantageous position to hand of the other side, once you break your promise,the other side can punish you. From the point of this angle, order contract of legislative keep under control is this one train of thought actually to reflect.

If say, you fear to reach castigatory advantageous position to hand of the other side, then another means builds your eligible namely oneself reputation. Inside academic field region, build academic fame to build reliability namely, if you are a rational person, the academic fame that you won't abandon yourself at disregarding. Answer the past to look from this angle so, this and very much today company cost many time money to build a brand is a truth, build a brand to tell customer namely, I give my weak point at you, because I break faith with sombody, my loss will be very big. Look so from game theory angle, any violation sincere letter flatter oneself obtained scientific research the person of golden eggs, just is the academic fame that destroyed his, the loss gets more.

Finally from game theory angle, understandable the necessity that punish severely. Once the individual's learned sincere letter is destroyed, the article that can publish you without any magazines, meet without any universities employ you, only such, all investigator ability choose to believe the research of stranger. Stand in the perspective of spectator, may feel this kind of punishment is too severe, break his promise with respect to finish the lifetime of investigator, but in some sense, you do not hand over yourself, others should believe your research by what, once do a holiday to be able to lose everything,only I believe you, ability establishs a trust between the person that does not know. Should appear one after another in Chinese investigator so when another is not afraid of an Ishmael, what someone else can choose pair of whole China academia only is indiscriminate do not believe, because of stranger between believe unlikely it is cure model accredit, and sure requirement is general run-of-mill accredit.

Blessing hill is in its composing " Trust " in watch narrate, china is the country of low accredit, between stranger establish effective trust very hard. Undeserved accredit is not the individual's thing absolutely, when others chooses not to believe you, you can discover more and more can not move a step.

Scientific research sincere letter is a society of sincere letter essential. Plant in society of order of a fine, the author of achievement of great scientific research, also should become the lead person of fashion of the person that the carry out of great mind character and morals goes, good society. Build in academia lifelong the system that find out, right of academic dishonourable behavior 0 tolerate to had been carried program, and the scientific research person that serves as today's graduate student, future, you must want to begin from now with respect to this bowstring in take up head, stand fast the bottom line of scientific research and pursue one's studies. We know, philo-sophy this word is " Love For Wisdom " , hope we can return this first heart, if you have this love, the legislation that I believe not to need a sincere letter backside and ethics one layer upon layer inference, you can hold to somewhat.

Article caption drafts for complier place, primary problem is " scientific research sincere letter and ethics of pursue one's studies " .

未经允许不得转载:News » Wu Guanjun: Trustful value breaks his promise with what game theory perspective falls castigatory sy