Inside the friend circle of everybody, have small business of shoe of cropland of a few Pu more or less, no matter you are to had heard of only, still had bought, of shoe of anyhow Pu cropland ' fame ' already very big. Cast home to hit a holiday not to say first, resemble be able to bear or endure overcome A Di why don't those old brands sue it? I share my point of view to everybody.
A pair of good shoes not only do manual work is careful, and wear rise very comfortable also. Present youth besides pursuit beyond this 2 o'clock, the brand also is the main reason of the consideration, a lot of shoe go up to be able to have brand Logo apparently, but these a few letters to have or can be design protected true? The answer is not of course, as economic development, consumption level also is increasing, a pair of a bit better shoes want 100 several, and the AJ that the youth loves now is white perhaps coco and black coco are to should get on 1000 yuan more, small make up think average person cannot buy such a pair of shoe follow one's inclinationsly, nevertheless Chinese people is infinitely resourceful, naturally method satisfies this to do not have money to buy but have the market that likes very much, so Pu Tian Fake arose.
No matter be outer form or quality respect, pu cropland shoe has one to go all out with those old brands. Of this shining imitate why are those brands sued? Although call Pu Tian the shoe, but it is by a few small mill of place, big plant is done, if say to want to tell these people, so who is the accused, this lets collected evidence to have very big trouble, if be able to bear or endure,gram or Shi Adi were sued really, so regular meeting costs many manpower material resources, and mill amount is much, dispersive still, right as absolutely as these brands do not have advantage. There is a brand to had sued Pu cropland shoe really before, but what catch finally just is a small mill, to whole Pu Tian shoe it doesn't matter is affected.
And will look from consumption, the account that everybody chooses Pu cropland shoe is commonly retreat and beg next, of those not poor money can support quality goods as before, so old brand did not lose his market, also do not have any losses to them. And mimic is mimic, put in a relativity only, they and quality goods do not have the likelihood to mark at all, do not have prosecution necessity at all so.
Still have a bit very important additionally, since because Pu cropland shoe is right mark crowd and price reason, cannot affect the market of quality goods. So the person that those are willing to buy Pu Tian, if have money later, can they still buy Pu Tian? That is necessarily won't, everybody does not want to wear a shoe to be distained to be false even, they have Qian Ken to be able to buy quality goods surely. So from another angle for, pu cropland shoe is being maintained to quality goods not only famous degree, more the stickiness that they are maintaining potential user. Of course this viewpoint is not very critical, these have even if a little now of bit of money advocate also choose to buy Pu Tian shoe.
When is above the reason that those old brands that are modelled on do not sue likely so, after looking, feel to be able to bear or endure is the brand scheming such as the gram very deep? Do not sue Pu cropland shoe, it is to do not have not only necessary, still give them freely to making ad because of Pu cropland shoe, water is deep really inside this. Small nevertheless make up feel, the quality of Pu cropland shoe and original have one to go all out absolutely, and the price returns conscience, if can the way that slam the door imitates mountain fastness, him choice starts a new brand, perhaps can astonish compatriots, and still frighten those foreign brands, hahaha.
Why to sue about those old brands? Why not keep within limits, does everybody still have better point of view, the welcome is compensatory
