Saw a group of data that collect about urging successfully recently:
The money that has a problem inside two months, the possibility that call in is almost 100% ;
The possibility that answers in adduction of 100 days is adjacent 80% ;
The possibility that calls in inside 180 days is 50% ;
And debt exceeds 12 months, the possibility that call in only remnant 20% .
Debt is urged earlier, the hope that returns money is divided with respect to how.
I consider this reason everybody is clear.
But why a lot of people were owed, do not choose urge for a short while close? 
Urge the disadvantage that close not in timeHinder to be dropped easily at believing the other side still has face, blindly " Laolai " in oral and affirmatory trap, it is us most we urge 3 kinds of obstacle that often encounter the case that accept.
If you knew,urge the harm that close not in time then, at that time you, can you still choose such " await one's doom " ?
Circumstance one: Receipt for a loan " expire " -- exceed litigant effectiveness for a given period of time
Case: 800 thousand yuan forget to ask for, sue after 4 years unexpectedly out of court
Li Mou's couple for many times loan gives business associate Fang Mou to be used at managing. After loan expires, fang Mou did not repay debt, li Mou's couple also was not urged to Fang Mou again return this borrow or lend money.
4 years are lain between when, li Mou's couple discovers a some dozen receipt for a loan suddenly, then to forensic to lodge a complaint, ask Fang Mou repays 800 thousand yuan of debt. In front courtyard careful, fang Mou argue says this case already exceeded litigant effectiveness for a given period of time, request people court rejects accuser lawsuit to request lawfully.
Final, the court adjudicates the suit that rejects accuser Li Mou's couple requests lawfully.
Netizen comment: The hand grasps the evidence of irrefutable evidence, cannot win this lawsuit?
Litigant effectiveness for a given period of time: Show civil rights is in during legal effectiveness for a given period of time by the obligee of enroach on inside not exercise right, when effectiveness for a given period of time during when at the expiration of one's term of office, debtor obtains counterplea of litigant effectiveness for a given period of time to counterpoise. (namely: After at the expiration of one's term of office of litigant effectiveness for a given period of time, obligor but repudiate its are compulsory, )
Circumstance 2: Money devalues (monetary price difference)
Case: Brushstroke sought money of 20 years
20 years ago, the Laohe below old Ji Qian 30 did not return more did not have sign. So old in, when he does not cherish a hope. But last year, laoji brings back him to accumulate meeting old home for years how to spend old age to be discovered.
The court is passed after commentate the law is reasonable, laoji agrees to remand Laohe's debt,
20 years are lain between when, laohe and old season sit in again together, classics both sides talks things over, laoji remands 320 thousand debt all.
Netizen comment: 99 years 300 thousand can a toilet is Mai Yidong building, insufficient now. . .
Circumstance 3: Person money two sky -- the friend is not done, money also was done not have
Having is: Want to lose a friend? After that looks for TA to borrow Qian Ran, be not returned.
The personal experience that this Duan Zi is how many person...
The court sues flow: Prepare indictment, hand in litigant expenses to seat of the accused person to the court refers indictment and provide evidence beforehand (other and IOU, written evidence) await cognizance, general case knot of careful of 6 months court, 6 months cannot the approval of classics court dean that careful writtens guarantee can lengthen the adjudicative become effective such as 6 months, if the other side does not return money, can apply for a court to be carried out compulsively (if the other side does not have money, can apply for to conserve the building of the other side)
After passing afore-mentioned flow, average judgment time is 3 to 6 months.
Court of sanded division people comes on stage south city of near future Guangzhou " regulations of quote of evidence of Internet electron data, attestation " , express among them: Henceforth, the electronic data such as chatting record of small letter, QQ can be used as significant evidence. Leave out quote, notarial before place needs " wasteful " time. Shortened effectively wait because of receipt for a loan is lost or be being marred, what need the notarization of expenditure, proof time.
Owing money still is not a stumbling block that compose builds sincere letter society all the time, it is difficult that everybody is saying to want money only, it is difficult to want money.
But no matter be,sue to the court, still be in [Laolai inquires] platform is released entrust, it is the individual undertakes urging closing even.
If you can be urged in time,close, want money, it is so difficult to be done not have actually!
