Is responsibility of primary and secondary certainly 37 minutes?
Before me by taxi car, open the door bump to motor-car riding report, the taxi driver jockeys not complete keep to the side, responsibility maintains a book to sentence me to be less important responsibility, the driver is main responsibility, I want to know this compensation is being occupied is more certain than the problem is 73, I occupy 30 ％ , I feel I had a deficit, everybody feels my compensation is occupied than can a bit less
This particular case is particular analysis, if caused greater harm to electric car, no matter primary and secondary, compensation is very tall.
If if indemnity is very tall,be being divided, 37 have a place really unreasonable, reason is as follows: Should look above all the taxi accords with safety to drive at that time, next whether is autocycle put in the illegal behavior such as speed gear shift. If autocycle knows perfectly well ahead taxi be about to keep to the side stops, alternate even in the past, autocycle should bear main responsibility actually.
Usually, when taxi berth, passenger from footpath the place with person little flow opens the door, also be for passenger and the consideration of car driver safety from the back. Autocycle was opened the door to bump by you, OK and affirmative is, travelling speed of this autocycle driver is certain very fast, put in fluky psychology at the same time, so autocycle car advocate should oneself bear main responsibility.
I do not believe he does not know the taxi is the door that the passenger gets off by the side of which, must squeeze forcedly come in!
