Law courtyard associate professor informs against a dean everywhere be rebuffed, does cognizance pap

Law courtyard associate professor informs against a dean everywhere be rebuffed,

See check heavy report to show, the document of the paper is duplicate than exceeding 50% when, yao Hongjun becomes aware getting what he should inform against to borrowed is for a time " final " thing. This Shanghai politics and law learns the associate professor of courtyard law institute, hou Huaixia of dean of attention this academy is suspected of " borrowed " already 9 years. Rely on these checking to weigh a report, he is written to branch of ranking education director inform against a letter, school of work following experience reflects a condition, call periodical and thesis textual author, also send on the net post, the result is not to have be rebuffed of an other place. (on April 3 " Chinese youth signs up for " )

Expert of a law, do adventitious one case the paper makes false event -- this is the actual awkwardness that academic processing is faced with probably.

This is awkward, incorporate is on 3 problems: It is the old paper previously, you can be checked after all with new standard? For instance somebody insists to think, "The doctoral paper of Hou was published 2008, informing against a person is to used those who tell a network to check heavy software to detect 2015, this is to use present software and standard to detect the article in the past " . 2 it is a college in " academic committee " , does its independence function deny the role of;equal;fitter;fittest;qualified;equal to ref? Having an appearance is afford for thought -- long-term since, college professor is pointed to to exist " borrowed " behavior is handed in after be being evaluated by school learning committee, the conclusion that reach is more " excessive cite " or non-standard, this ever also was oppugned to be " demote processing " . Another, if inform against a person to resent to the academic committee conclusion of the college, still have the tripartite ruling of more independent justice? Very regretful, the answer of at present is negative it seems that.

The learning of low end makes a holiday is very easy hope to wear, for instance " do not know to tell a network " Di Tianlin incident; But high-end doubt is like academic dishonourable, be afraid with respect to the meeting complex relation because of countless ties your truth is locked up greatly like dense fog. Time of experience thing paper is for instance ages ago, for instance experience thing person reside important post personally nowadays, investigate inadequacy of force of constituent public letter to having with informant again for instance again all kind direct or indirect interest is associated. Say again continuously a few whiter, once doubt is like academic dishonourable problem to blend,entered " circle " and smoke hard from, allowing is informing against a person is be filled with indignation again, it is very difficult to be afraid the development of driving incident. A detail is worth say, since May 2015, the material in Yaohong army while you're at it begins to inform against, a year many past, ability come " investigation conclusion " . Such program justice, hard to avoid calls life doubt.

Does cognizance paper borrowed it why be returned than entering a day is difficult to why be returned than entering a day? The answer no more than of this problem two: It is standardization is short of break, what neither one unites is alleged " GB " , then low rank investigation often calls a person very hard be convinced; 2 it is a stratification operation, in the investigation square hand that speech power control accuses to be in and does not become independent absolutely, complain the person that inform against to have appeal right very hard 2 times. Result, strength is ground smooth, indignation by put an end to, incident also vanished completely.

Someone says, learning is social conscience. Paper a paste, culture invents random dance of evil wind of hard to avoid. If academia is borroweding all the day,be like with doubt again borrowed between be troubled by in full swing, how many is the person thought of purposely and still decide force to go does hoary head poor classics study science? Say from this meaning, hope Yao Hong Jun is informed against wait for incident, can drive paper of national level major to build a holiday to grind truly those who sentence a mechanism build.

Civil / Deng Haijian

未经允许不得转载:News » Law courtyard associate professor informs against a dean everywhere be rebuffed, does cognizance pap