VAR3 second occurrence controversy is sentenced punish, chairman Laimote: The judgment is sentenced

VAR3 second occurrence controversy is sentenced punish, chairman Laimote: The judgment is sentenced punish shameless

The tiger attacks on April 4 dispatch before dawn finishs today the match of athletics of Er Ba E and Laimote, the central point that Spanish all circles pays close attention to was made after contest, because be sentenced a few times of the VAR in the match,punish caused controversy and dissatisfaction.

Match begin 5 minutes, athletics of Bi Er Ba E relies on Urey - Beierxishen's goal is banner, score of Yiniyaji excommunicate general enlarges 2-0.

Subsequently nevertheless controversy appears: Coke is inside forbidden zone burst open the door of reinforce corner kick, the judgment is sentenced at the beginning punish a goal effective, but after watching VAR, change the original sentence is blown punish Coke to pound the other side door general Ailailin is prevenient, the goal is invalid. Subsequently, on arm of Ha Sen that in passing, is laid in Yinige again, but the judgment did not play the ball that punish a dot.

The second half spells the trip after grabbing inside Roger forbidden zone, yinige considers as to foul after the judgment watchs VAR, but the 50% balls that finish respect of athletics of Er Ba E thinks this is a standard. Him Roger holds a knife advocate punish hit the target.

Kabake is in the 89th minute almost burst open the door of head of reinforce corner kick, take away 1 minute for Laimote almost, but often last hour, simon fouls to Muniyayin, latter is punished independently in person hit the target, do not cross Laimote the respect thinks, makesi is in to be attacked this on the problem with prevenient offside.

After contest, chairman Laimote base division - Kadalan is accepting media group when visitting, special rave arrives: "I hope to convey me to be opposite to everybody today the view of the match: This is the distress on the football ground, I serve as once the proponent of VAR, cannot believe VAR now, I am not trustful now why reason and say decline. " " in the match sentence 3 times punish the outcome that changed the game, mix e.g. that of door general collide, I feel everybody can see; Once apparent dot ball was not sentenced; Ball of the last dot, I had not seen specific offside line, but also explain without the person this orders a ball. But also explain without the person this orders a ball..

"Our some players are very sad, this is professional football, I talk at ordinary times is to taking breeding and courtesy, I also hope to support and help juridical work all the time, but today's thing, dye-in-the-wood conscienceless, I believe 3 times this to sentence punish, after the judgment returns the home, he can hold a head in the arms to repent. " this is in Spanish football all along with the youthful chairman respecting with celebrated with the power of a thunderbolt and the speed of lightning.

"The judgment is sentenced without what had explained them punish, our protest is such, we won't initiate the arbitration of any forms again, I serve as Laimote's chairman, I am about to stand defend my club, but we won't be published again any state or indictment. I believe the judgment sees the work that he does, enough he is ashamed. Enough he is ashamed..

"If sufficient assist begin to ban contest from today 500 my matches, that also is indifferent to, this sports season 6 matches, at least 10 miscarriage of justices, our for no reason at all desertioned a lot of minutes, the football is not such. The football is not such..

未经允许不得转载:News » VAR3 second occurrence controversy is sentenced punish, chairman Laimote: The judgment is sentenced