Before paragraph time Zhou Libo holds a gun case Tibetan poison is adjudged by American court innocent, because violate traffic regulation,be fined finally 150 dollars, at the outset the accusation of public prosecution Zhou Libo has two, the first is poison of Zhou Libo Tibet, the 2nd holds a gun illegally namely, because firearms was checked inside Zhou Libo bag, if 2 accusation hold water, according to the law of American place Zhou Libo will face the prison term that is as long as 21 years, must say this the case is the case that affects Zhou Libo lifetime, and the lawyer that Zhou Libo retains is round also it may be said is luxurious lawyer group, do not cross Zhou Libo by innocent release although lawyer group is costly,say that day but be not day price, estate of common United States can bearAround of Zhou Libo law case adds up to sessional 10, the last time is sessional by innocent release, the counsel for the defence of the Zhou Libo when open a court session to bar the police of the car raised a question at that time, why is that you bar check? What is reason? If the car of a normal travel is barred fall,be in the United States, it is the reason with sufficient need, otherwise constabulary itself executes the law to be put in the problem, whether does the driver agree to jockey additionally examination, and ransack whether does car have procedures this is focal problem. Although early before media says because be on highway,Zhou Libo is move with the body on the ground by constabulary intercept, but the testimony that the police when public prosecution provides is machine of the hatchet man when driving because of Zhou Libo, the police on front courtyard careful can original term is offerred narrate, answer a question in the police later, the lawyer took out Zhou Libo mobile phone to prove, any communicating is had no to record when Zhou Libo drives at that time, it is American police says Zhou Libo agreed to jockey at that time additionally requirement, does the lawyer say you can understand Chinese directly? The police expresses to understand on the court not, subsequently the lawyer asks, how do you know Zhou Libo agreed then, twice ask a question brings about constabulary confession to be overthrown directly. What is testimony overthrown to mean? That is the flow that whole police handles a case appeared problem, if handle a case,flow appeared problem, all evidence instant is invalid, this is mixed in those days Xin Pusen case is same, case flow is incorrect, cannot do guilty conclude, because of this Zhou Libo by innocent release. If the police is offerred testimony is about Zhou Libo snakelike drive, zhou Libo may be then troublesome big, because may be suspected wine drives poison, so constabulary intercept driver puts forward to check fair and reasonable, may somebody raises question, who are that firearms and drugs? That is a thing, do not have any correlation really with Zhou Libo, about violating traffic regulation Zhou Libo expresses self-identity, fine end a case of 150 U.S. dollors finally so.