In one day is bitten by the dog, hate already was in mind 　 the village that man Zou Mou stayed in because of be being lived in in the son in August 2017 has been bitten by the dog, use fluorine second acid kind rat medicine immerses gallinaceous liver, liver of will poisonous chicken puts in in village lawn. In December 2017, man Zou Mou is detained by criminal. In March 2018, procuratorial work mechanism goes to this case public prosecution court. Idea is too simple, feed death of poisonous chicken liver in order to lead to the 6 pet dog that 5 owner raise disaster village by accident however. The man says is to think kill with poison roams about the consequence that the dog did not consider to be eaten, zou Mou is fond of by oneself only evil, put in dangerous material intentionally, compromise public safety, have not cause serious consequence, its behavior already was formed put dangerous material on the blame, public prosecution mechanism accuses accusation holds water. Why to form put dangerous material on the blame, is to destroy belongings blame intentionally? Basis " criminal law of People's Republic of China " the 114th regulation, putting place of dangerous material blame on encroachment direct object is a country wait for material to putting harm on pathogen of gender, radioactivity, contagion prohibit the person safety of sexual government order and social community and state-private belongings safety. Humanness was sure to carry out this crime to put harm on the material such as pathogen of gender, radioactivity, contagion the harm is communal the safe, behaviour that has not cause serious consequence; Or put in the material such as pathogen of harm sex, radioactivity, contagion to send a person to weigh injury, death to perhaps make state-private belongings suffers great losing behavior. The immediate consequence of the case that send poison is send a victim to get hurt or die, affect a family directly. This blame is danger makes, its hold water not to need to appear the actual result that the toxic or great state-private belongings of not specific and most person suffers damage, the behavior enough that wants behavior person only compromises public safety, have the dangerous presence that compromises public safety namely can. This blame is in subjective side expression intended. Can stem from already direct and intended, also can stem from indirect and intended. Alleged and intended, the behavior sending poison that knows perfectly well oneself for the person all right namely compromises public safety, cause a large number of losses of not specific much person casualty or state-private belongings likely, and hope or indulge the happening of this kind of result. Projecting poisonous motivation can be various, but different motive is not affected conviction. Put in the main way of behavior: It is will dangerous material puts in not only at offerring in the food of the food that decide a person or beverage; 2 be in putting the river that uses at waiting for person, cultivate, pond, well on to wait poison; 3 it is to be in a few public release pathogen of radioactivity, contagion. Think via checking, the greenbelt of the village belongs to collective owner to share, and the characteristic that has open sex, liquidity, ought to maintain for public, the law profit that the behavior that the accused person puts poisonous chicken on liver in lawn encroachs is not pure point to pet dog raise advocate money property right, however safety of the life that enough decides most person to notting only, belongings is formed encroach. Basis " criminal law of People's Republic of China " the 275th regulation, destroy property blame intentionally, it is to show intended destruction perhaps damages state-private property, amount perhaps has the action of other and serious clue greatly relatively. This blame is in subjective side expression intended. Guilty purpose is not to get property illegally to destroy property however. Destroy property intentionally it is thus clear that blame and put in dangerous material blame to produce imaginary contest to close, make contrast through crime so, can discover Zou Mou is in village garden intentionally to send poison, although its are subjective,just destroy village stray dog, but what reality creates communal district however is insecure, after all the fluidity in the village is great, people activity eliminates a child often to feed drugs possibility by accident low, reason court adjudicates putting dangerous material on the blame also is reasonable and lawful. Zou Mou of the accused person can offer the guilty fact that states his according to the facts to case hind, OK and light punishment. Recently, the court releases a case to adjudicate a result, some makes Zou of person of first instance the accused put dangerous material on the blame, sentence a set term of imprisonment 3 years. Copyright statement: If involve copyright issue, ask an author to hold authority to belong to the proof contacts with this net (article origin: Oriental head)