Sun Yang inflicts heavy losses on again, swiss supreme court answers case hair CAS to reiterate like

On Feburary 8, 2020, international sports arbitration tribunal (CAS) the world before announcing this turns over orgnaization of a shot in the arm (WADA) appeal to Chinese swimmer Sun Yang and international swim couplet (FINA) the arbitral result of one case, sun Yang is banned to surpass 8 years, according to the regulation of international sports arbitration tribunal, if be opposite,this adjudication result resents, but at the inside very narrow range reason inside 30 days supreme court of Xiangrui person federal puts forward to appeal.

Sun Yang puts forward to appeal subsequently, it is by May when, beijing youth newspaper interviews a Chinese lawyer that pays close attention to this case, the report says before a week WADA had obtained the legal document such as the official letter that comes from Swiss federal supreme court and petition for appeal, and this basically means Sun Yang one case begins cognizance formally.

Went for some time again nowadays, according to press of domestic media red star, swiss federal supreme court sends Sun Yang case a CAS to weigh the possibility of careful likely. This is meant, the tell prospect on Sun Yang is very bad!

The international before this swim executive chairman of couplet law committee amounts to triumphant favour of human relations · to express, yang Shang of even if grandson appeals to a success, also be at most answer case hair CAS to weigh careful. Be aimed at such viewpoint, swiss federal court expresses clearly, the case hair that does not eliminate to meeting general violates the reason such as compasses as a result of front courtyard careful and appeal answers arbitration tribunal to weigh the possibility of careful.

According to the regulation of Swiss federal supreme court, the appeal that they can accept 5 kinds of types only (the member that arbitrate is appointed or composition of arbitral front courtyard violates compasses, arbitral front courtyard to be opposite its oneself administer have without maintain have by accident, arbitral front courtyard exceeds cut into parts or leakage is cut into parts, destroy quits principle or encroach lawsuit to counterpoise, and Sun Yang group mentions in the light of the 4th appeal, consider as the interpreter on the hearing the problem, destroyed quits problem.

Nevertheless according to Swiss alliance the response of the supreme court looks, appeal in the light of this, final result is probable it is to send a CAS to weigh careful.

This comes to Sun Yang say, it is tremendous bad news, because what ban contest 8 years to punish to Sun Yang is make before this, it is CAS, although Swiss federal supreme court sends the case a CAS to weigh careful, the machine rate that Sun Yang turns over is very little likewise. After all the decision before everybody won't overthrow oneself.