The love in front courtyard careful is strange art the record watching a movie that loses an user ba_MV

# of # lead order programme

On June 4 afternoon, "Love is strange art celebrate proposal of order programme of lead of one's remaining years " accuser prestige says in small gain dispatch, "I do not plan to continue to use love to surprise art, because,not be lead order programme, because the star gets a member,also not be, because they are in front courtyard careful,record my view image however be taken, about a hundred page. Those who feel privacy is encroached is very serious, be without an App of safe feeling, be inspected at any time evil. Be inspected at any time evil..

The love in front courtyard careful is strange art the record watching a movie that loses an user backhand, is this fine hand still faints after all chess?

Since mentioned privacy, do then we see love surprise art how does privacy policy say after all?

Did not think of opening be struck by lightning. This familiar clause, with what had been affirmed to disable by the court in the lawsuit before this " format clause does not calculate format clause " exactly like. Love is strange art lost lawsuit, how to still know to change?

Key or attention love are strange art we are being taken out what to see first in front courtyard careful is individual information. Basis " GB/T 35273-2017 " safety of information of individual of information security technology is normative "

Individual information points to what with the electron other perhaps way records to perhaps can identify identity of specific natural person to perhaps reflect all sorts of information of circumstance of activity of specific natural person with other information union alone. The individual information that involves in privacy policy originally includes an individual basic material (include telephone number of individual full name, birthday, sexual distinction, address, individual, email) , individual identity information (include Id information) , individual.

So the record watching a movie of Wu Lv division is individual privacy information without doubt, and it is an individual sensitive information.

And this second open a court session is open open a court session. Basis " code of civil law " the 68th

The evidence of secret to involving a country, trade secret and individual privacy ought to keep secret, need to be shown in the court, must not show when open open a court session.

Because this loves to surprise art the action that publicizes the record that watch a movie on front courtyard, do not accord with a code of civil law to concern a provision apparently.

But from the back love is strange art Fang Shengming is underground qualitative card. But showing behavior itself is lawbreaking.

Does that love to surprise below special situation art whether authority announces individual privacy?

Through con this expatiatory agreement, in the 4th part " how are we shared, make over, the individual information that discloses you publicly " in we still were found really

Wait for a regulation according to legal laws and regulations, below undermentioned circumstance, share, make over, the individual information that discloses you publicly need not ask for so that your accredit agrees beforehand:

As safe as the country, national defence safety is direct and relevant;

As direct as great and public safety, communal sanitation, public interest relevant;

Investigate with crime, sue, adjudgement and court decision are carried out etc direct and relevant; Or of the requirement that waits for mechanism having right according to the requirement of legal laws and regulations, executive authority or public security organs;

Stem from the great and legitimate rights and interests such as the life that maintains you or other individual, belongings but get you oneself agree very hard again;

Individual information is you make public to the society by oneself or from the channel that makes public legally (wait for channel publicly like information of legal press, government) in collect;

Need according to be signed with you and fulfilling relevant agreement or place of other and written file;

The other state of the regulation such as legal laws and regulations.

Is @ love strange art which do you see be arranged to Wu Lv division appropriate? Be afraid which improper.

And this is violated compasses collect violate compasses the evidence that show is what to weighs your work to use after all, rangaiji Where is art pleasant stick one's chin out? According to Wu Lv division knows knowable, the accused is to explain love is strange merely art format clause all arrived to inform obligation. And no matter user use love is strange art received user agreement to revise with the user have after all between the announcement causal, dan Aiji art are oneself in introductive him certain the format clause in the agreement does not belong to format clause? How should here refer the evidence that is used technically at proving format clause is effective to prove the effectiveness of format clause? Is this a kind of not self-confident expression?