Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

Civil / read methodology

Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

Is borroweding still artistic?

Guangzhou academy of fine arts taught Feng Feng to hold an art exhibition, but the cartoon character figure in art exhibition is as similar as height of Mi Fei hare however, what differ exclusively is much mouth of a piece of duck, also cause the extensive heat of netizens very quickly to discuss, him Feng Feng also made a response to this, but netizen not show respect for: Dead duck is stubborn.

1. is newest and follow-up, hare government responds to Mi Fei: Already reached reconcile

Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

In Feng Feng the professor is exposed to the sun to give art exhibition doubt to be like when borroweding, ceng Lianfa of government of rice humble hare concerns meter of phenanthrene hare many times is how to produce the small gain that come out, still responded to a netizen, say to latest news can be announced in time.

Came now newest follow-up, it is copyright of organizer of Professor Feng Feng, art exhibition and Mi Fei hare square this tripartite was reached reconcile, originally this art exhibition is to prepare to be begun March, stopped instantly now, next him Feng Feng also seems this doubt the work that borrowed to give of one's own accord meter of phenanthrene hare copyright square, still have even if each affirmatory use this doubt to seem the work that borrowed no longer.

2. Feng Feng responds to before this: If tort can have law to come punish

Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

Why just beginning to accept when interviewing, feng Feng is taught can so the calm is calm and at ease, ground of so can good energy of life says this is the work that this studied a few years, still say: "If tort can have law,come punish " .

Reason both neither is him direct divert the student's work (some students are likely to be perfunctory him take liberties with works) , and bring about oneself to be to borrowed by mistake, actually original idea is not to borrowed meter of phenanthrene hare, take the student's work however; Also not be Feng Feng the professor had not heard of at all had not seen Mi Fei hare.

Real reason is, professor Feng Feng knows meter of phenanthrene hare, but he thinks this figure belongs to meter of phenanthrene hare public symbol, and he produces art again, what need most is creativity, the germ of creativity depends on the consciousness of imagination and expression, so his creation came out the work that doubt seems meter of phenanthrene hare.

Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

3. Feng Feng and one numerous artist how look upon this matter

These artists regard this as is the large classroom of a public education. Since be classroom, become these enthusiastic netizens the student namely apparently, is that teacher Feng Feng professor and one numerous the person that is his platform?

Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

Really, anybody has the power of creation, but at the same time everybody also must abide by copyright law, because copyright law is the protection of pair of people power, absolutely cannot the alleged influence for oneself is wanton the authority that violates other.

In these professor eyes, borrowed borroweded, alarming need not is, return next time dare, anyway I this is artistic, you did not understand to be opposite, do not have a qualification to say me. Still you understood how? Letting me use is cabined my creativity, be in namely restrict people imagination, destroying innovation ability of the society namely, how to say he is justifiable anyway.

Actually all these has best arrangement, be Professor Feng Feng then " the picture is made " in compare Mi Fei hare became much a mouth, as it happens is corresponding Feng Feng teachs a series of responses later, dead duck is stubborn it is again appropriate really do not pass.

Not all of course artist is such, the journalist that seizes bright net is interviewed, the member that also has art society says this is a hype purely, to enlarge oneself famous degree, do not have any action to artistic development.

Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert

The copyright that any artwork have him is protected period, go undertaking inside this protective period 2 change creation, no matter how you say, with respect to a word, your tort. You pull what reason to was not used, the fact borroweds namely, pull art to no matter what pull,pull imagination trashy. Know tort still dare be used, either clumsy is bad.

未经允许不得转载:MV » Wide beautiful professor borroweds sequel, the response before this: I am intended divert