Today, this lawyer received an advisory the accused to browbeat in order to die Mr Wang of problem of different idea divorce (alias, accuser) . He is in Beijing at present east court of the city zone sues a divorce. Because be the 2nd,sue a divorce, this case sentences the possibility that leave very big, but the likelihood is marriage during the relation puts add longer, the accused wants to be illogical and bring about its the mood is very excited. What cannot think of more is the accused takes out a bottle of sleeping pill suddenly to pour the suicide in the entrance on the court. After occurrence emergency, everybody sends a hospital the accused instantly. Through rescue of do all one can, the accused take a turn to be out of danger. Soon front courtyard careful cannot proceed, the judge announces case break down is tried. Think oneself can win divorce court decision very quickly originally, but appear now this kind of circumstance also lets Mr Wang the bottom was done not have in the heart, if why handle this case,to this divorce lawyer then advisory future court is met.
Cannot join suit to front courtyard because of special status to party of the one party in lawsuit, the court ought to rule case break down is tried, cognizance restores again after waiting for special status to disappear. In this case, the judge made the ruling that break down tries just about. It is the court that Mr Wang cares most next whether sentence the question that leave. To this, this marital lawyer thinks: The court ought to make a judgment honestly to the case lawfully according to case fact, do not suffer any tortious interference. The accused in this case cannot face suit correctly, lawfully exercise right, safeguard oneself to close right increase, adopt on the court however " cry 2 be troubled by 3 hang oneself " means tries to browbeat judge, affect the cognizance of the case then. To this kind of wrong action, the court won't be indulged, the judicatory that can damage a court badly otherwise is authoritative.
On put together, this lawyer thinks: The juridical result with final court won't be affected, but after the court may have done its thought to work beforehand, adjudicate again.
