The company is brushed by person ill will negative, should Internet platform carry boiler on the bac

Do not have a law to say, before paragraph time, a staff of our company left his post because of pay issue, after leaving one's post, he registers Zhang name on numerous Internet platform, ill will released the negative information of a lot of our companies, content is basic it is to belong to add inflammatory details to, follow what our company says bilk gang is general. After the boss sees anger, contacted the other side to handle an issue not after fruit, arrange me manage of this SEO place to go drops these negative...

Internet

Processing company is negative at first I thought of " cogged "

My this individual is lazier, can walk along shortcut not to go the long way round absolutely, when the boss gives me this job at that time, I begin to think of to search on the net namely search some " professional personage " spend calamity of money pass the time in a leisurely way. But tragic is, this is helped " able person " ask a price is not low, anyhow with respect to thousands of ocean, and after I also dare not make sure this helps a person won't take money, pull to me black, take shortcut so this road, I consider repeatedly later still give denied.

"Qiu Ju " general perplexity

Since spend money " cogged " have a risk, then I still start work as oneself have ample food and clothing. I at that time am just as " Qiu Ju " appendages is general, iron the heart should be company appeal after all. But after experiencing do sth over and over again one time, I still was hit by brutal reality after all remember a slap on the face. I discover a few big platform are essential with respect to not buy it. Resemble a few " those who deceive people " a kind of sensitive word, appear in these platform eyes not affect the whole. I feel puzzled, fall in the circumstance that does not have any evidence so caustic a company, don't this calculate calumniatory? Hey, I am too innocent really.

Advisory lawyer: Some problems can talk things over with platform only solve

Be in for many times appeal handles an issue not below the circumstance of fruit, I can be to passed legal measure dimension to counterpoise only. After the result consults a lawyer, my heart cool one cut, be aimed at this kind of problem, the answer that the lawyer gives me is, talk things over with platform as far as possible solve. Can talk things over, it which have is so easy that which have? Should know a lot of big platform use artificial intelligence now (artificial wisdom barrier) customer service will handle solve a problem, what to still talk about to negotiate processing, with who to talk things over after all? Let a person be about to cry really without the tear...

When start a rumour when 0 cost, what can I still say?

Do not know now what is the mechanism of examine and verify of a few platform, for instance I say " the activity that XX company place organizes deceives people namely " , don't this calculate violate compasses? Has hair post person provided evidence? Without! What do public security bureau and governmental unit have to report? Without! But if invite target customer,see with respect to a such irresponsible answers, can they have why impressions? Network start a rumour 0 cost, what can I still say? !

As SEO, I ever also had been sent in certain platform a few outside catenary and soft advertisement, for instance some interlocution platform, after I accept an answer, I cannot control this interlocution already completely, the right that deletes basically repeatedly is done not have! At that time this interlocution does not belong to my individual already completely, copyright puts in platform 's charge it seems that all, never mention it the right that deletes me to be revised repeatedly even is done not have!

But if gave an issue? For instance a my answer that is accepted is suspected of tort perhaps be suspected of slandering, after giving an issue, whose responsibility is that? Is this boiler will platform carry on the back or I am carried on the back after all? This with respect to unknown!