Achieve formerly not easy, ask conveniently attention!
Recently, the B-52 bomber that a Afghan U.S. Armies appeared on the network by the news of down of tower benefit class. It is him Taliban allegedly allege, in Afghan south one calls the U.S. Army base that Heermande visits the B-52 strategy bomber of the down around. After the plane is hit at that time with respect to crash, the air man on machine also died. The U.S. Army denied this information, allege be in without bomber Afghan loss. So, who should we believe after all?
(network of Syrian Muraselon news reports cut pursues, in fact coverage of this news network often reports false news)
Want to clear up its truth, must search clues above all from inside the information that has obtained. Him repass the analysis will judge, this for instance both sides sticks to his argument. From Taliban for the respect, if its say is true, so the strong attack instrument that proves force of remains of armed of tower benefit class had obtained bomber of blow U.S. Army, this constituted powerful menace in Afghan existence to the U.S. Army. The look upon of mark sex incident with can become important even. And U.S. Army respect, if gave so serious business really, sure it is to deny by every means. Do not say to be impassable on face otherwise, plan even a lot of national defence to be able to be thrown into confusion. So the analysis on driven machine, taliban and beautiful national capital have sufficient reason to publicize completely contrary two kinds likelihood.
(the B-52 bomber that Cheng of this fixed fire does not wear missile of pickaback type air defence to fly normally quite at all)
[one of important pillar that B-52 bomber can say is American nuclear strike capability force, 3 B-52 ever still flew to Russia beautiful muscle before. ]
So analyse from possibility again, taliban wants down B-52 bomber of this kind of strategy, that is to taking AK47 to mow not just can be hit. The circumjacent certainly will of U.S. Army base also can have alert, want to come with pickaback type missile the strategic bomber that down has powerful viability also is very difficult. In fact, even if is to be in garrison of Russia of sneak attack of class of benefit of 80 time tower when, basically also be to choose carriage helicopter to be hit so easily, viability not tall " soft persimmon " will hold. Missile of pickaback type air defence, it is merely it is OK to gave foot with aerostat the ability of one wrestle, is not a kind of powerful attack weapon. It and normal ground-to-air missile are compared, it is cannon-shot no matter, shoot ability of tall, interference rejection, or warhead power is complete either a grade. May somebody was refuted, say B-52 of theoretic possible still down, the sand spy F-15 that introduced from the northern and western nationalities or from abroad after all a place of strategic importance arms to hit upper air with missile comes. How can this kind of old plane mix B-52 F-15 comparing. This lets me remember a jest, those who say is to a F-15 is B-52 convoy, on the road especially other and dull. The air man of F-15 dallies with B-52 to say through radio: "Your this plane too the old lady is cumbersome, can with me loop? " ; B-52 air man is laughing at an answer: "I can put out two engine, are you OK? Are you OK??
(The base of bomber of American deploy B-52 is relatively safe base, won't put advanced line area, anyway where does vast range go to enough)
Return to the subject, although B-52 is veteran, this plane is to go up century 50 time enlist in army, can be old but vigorous, the United States plans to upgrade to it, let its enlist in army 2040. Although theoretic Taliban has the possibility of B-52 of down of missile of use pickaback type, but this probability won't be more sufficient than the country take next world cup champion tall how many. Why so say, because the cannon-shot of pickaback type missile can't is opposite,this plants B-52 " stratospheric fort " constitute menace. And what say in news then is Taliban make a surprise attack when falling since B-52, theoretic cannon-shot is enough. But bomber of this kind of strategy does not have B-52 at all,deploy passes to Afghan base. The closest base is Qatar and alternate dagger Garcia's base, ability has deploy B-52 over there. And show level to hit Afghanistan to be done not have at all necessary employ B-52 bomber. So I just say or state with certainty this kind of probability is small negligible not plan. The photograph of the crash B-52 that besides appears in news then, was 2016 actually the B-52 picture in crash of Guam out of control.
(the B-52 of 8 engine do you feel to be necessary to increase thrust? )
[the picture that the photograph of B-52 crash is Guam crash completely, taliban's message is OK without any photographs evidence]
According to plan B-52 of the U.S. Army this old guy still plans again battle a few years, enlist in army even full 100 years. That why doesn't the United States agree to change a new engine to B-52? Future enlists in army endlessly period, other do not say smooth oily money can be saved many. More do not carry new engine more province oil, thrust is bigger also, can promote plane property many. I feel the account that actually the United States does not change engine is original is recycle of old old equipment. Undeserved again beautiful money upgrades, and changed engine to raise rate, airframe structure ageing also was accelerated, whats must be changed lane is bad, be inferior to redesigning. The most important of course is a budget insufficient, do not have money what no use. Boeing new fund 737 it is old model changed new engine result to draw one caboodle to bother a thing. So U.S. Army or not do sth over and over again, want anyway faster have B-1B, should more advanced have B-2. Not worthwhile wastes money here. What does everybody have interesting view, the welcome leaves a message beneath discuss! (support please firm taste article group all sorts of start article and hypostatic book formerly, is independent major gutty have makings) ?
