To satisfy the development of socioeconomy, the building of a lot of cities plans to cannot have satisfied requirement, develop to assure economy, cleared developing block up, various places is in those who undertake certain dimensions to ask for the ground to tear open change, subsequently and those who come is the various dispute that tear open change, processing is undeserved evolve into violent incident directly, yang Yong asks for the ground to tear open change lawyer to take everybody to look, tear open change to if force executes the law,just can bear what law consequence.
Our for the moment is the violent understanding that tear open change forced releasing, forced releasing is divided again for two kinds of circumstances, one kind is lawful judicatory forced releasing is mixed illegal forced releasing, what is judicatory forced releasing? Person be expropriationed does not apply for to administration is reconsidered or do not mention lawsuit of politics of start on a journey inside legal time limit, nonperformance compensates a decision, apply for people court to be carried out compulsively lawfully by government of people of class of the city that makes a building collect a decision, county.
Forced releasing of what dispute law, understandable for, tear open change to just be done not have relevant examine and approve formalities, tear open through all sorts of stealing, the means such as force party lawful building is demolished, also somebody thinks to want what he does not agree to tear open move the capital to another place to call illegal forced releasing only.
Administrator is legal executant namely, one of character group must set strictly according to law, if break the law, brings consequence is more serious than someone else, not only destroy came administrative order and social standard, damaged governmental image, profanatory law is authoritative, destroyed social harmony.
Represent even if violate forced releasing what a lot of people think force executes the law, also somebody thinks, force tears open the human rights affront that change is people of pair of the change that be torn open, damage intentionally demesne belongings and individual safety, this is force executes the law the most apparent feature, force executes the law to be administration to break the law now in formally body not only, and from the point of view that defends justice, also should execute the law force limit break the law for administration.
Reason has at 2 o'clock: It is formally breaks the law. Be in our country, administration breaks the law is to point to what place of administrative principal part carries out, violate standard of administrative law law, the administrative relationship that enroach on bears law to protect has not make the administrative action of crime that has fault. From the point of formally, force executes the law is the illegal behavior of misuse of authority, its motive depends on seeking undeserved administrative increase, the fair principle with the reason that offended average person, common sense and accepted society, think and used force what stem from an interest, can consider as show break justice. 2 it is the need that safeguards fair justice.
Ancient Greek historian repairs heart of former times bottom to ever said: "Axiom just talks to go up when both sides is equal only, overmatch does the business that they can do, the weak endures the hardship that they must endure. " say from particular significance, should go when political power is too mighty, it often is controlled effectively hard, the most group right that is in weak force end comes true hard. Administrative principal part because the position of its oneself and powers and authorities of office, in safeguard society fairness implementation respect of justice has very big responsibility.
Also somebody thinks to execute the law force qualitative for administration undeserved more appropriate, for example, execute the law in a lot of lives non-standard it is unreasonable administrative action actually, force executes the law is not illegal behavior, it is the abuse of a kind of powers and authorities of office more, legal process makes favour inning administrative action, just because of the person that execute the law use a method undeserved, also moral character of the culture quality because of every administrator itself, thought, professional knowledge differ somewhat, the consequence that executes the law to be brought possibly likewise also differs somewhat.
So relevant course of study mies wife person, discuss come, discuss, to after force executes the law, needing to assume what law sequential, do not have final verdict, no matter final final conclusion how, want the other side to break the law only, endanger self interest, the person that still need each victims to take legal grievance to will break the law try sb.
