The American cure academia that can't bear: Use patient cell wantonly gain, shut a mouth to be not

Hear here, not may little person is considering a such issues: The doctor does not agree via the patient with respect to the commodity of cellular make it them, after all lawful? Actually, block those who write this book to Li Bei from Hairuida's time 2009, these practices are lawful. Be in the United States, store the example library that human body organizes is increasing. The report 1999 points out, the basis guards estimation, american whole nation stored the specimen of many 300 million tissue that comes from more than 170 million person, include appendix, ovarian, skin, adipose, blood to wait a moment. And 2009, the constituent specimen library that academy of American national sanitation invested 13.5 million dollar to build baby of a new student. Although if the doctor wants to use the patient's organization,do research now, obtain their license first with respect to need. Nevertheless, if be the organization that takes away in diagnostic process, live for instance check, the doctor thinks reservation comes down to use as the following research, need not agree with course patient. To such practice, somebody supports also somebody objects. Proponents think, current law is already enough, and also various orgnaizations and committee study this issue in investigation organization. However, antagonistic person shows, people has right of basic know the inside story to the utility of own cell, if their cell is used in the research that involves ethical issue, for instance research of nuke test, abort, intelligence, racial diversity, they should have authority to know. On the other hand, the practice that regards commodity as the cell still can continue of course, whether must tell a patient potential business interest of the cell as to the doctor, return unknown. 1999, the advisory committee of ethnics of national live thing of American president Clinton issued a report, the superintendency that admits the government studies to the organization is insufficient. Although they offer, the patient should have more control right to the utility of own cell, but the problem that who should put in 's charge about potential gain, they shut a mouth to be not carried however. And for the family to Hairuida, what they can do is not much, although can try to engage in a lawsuit,let people stop to do a test with sea fine-draw afterbirth, but the opportunity that many legal experts think to succeed is not great. Nevertheless, this also is not the result that they want. Son Sang Ni of Hai Ruida says: "I do not want to consider scientificly to bring what trouble, hope those help the scientists of the benefit on cellular body from the sea only, what can do to commemorate my mother, to our family one is explained. " die from Hairuida now already 65 years, know her real story probably, it is best to her souvenir.