If we should be discussed today, the problem is " the old wants to listen to most person opinion and small number of people to discuss a person to say so that calculate " , as the old of an organization, be democratic so be still authoritarian?
This is a lasting issue. Democracy has democratic advantage, have authoritarian necessity autocratically so, how should do after all? Our conclusion is the opinion that should listening to most person is crew even, but should discuss with the small number of people only, wanted a person finally to say to calculate.
Above all we should propose collective leader, the scientific sex that should make sure through collective leader we are decision-making and will arrest our a member too authoritarian. Will tell commonly, an a party to an undertaking must deploy 5 3 people, people a such team, so team the person inside each has his strong point, everybody is collective will head our firm, but we must make clear collective leader to not be equal to collective decision-making. When are if is any decision-making,we being done after all how should decision-making? Of course the regulation of the board of directors is a few obedient majority. The level is run in the company, we are met commonly Executive Board or general manager does consortium, a party to an undertaking can call together his team member, so the form that everybody adopts a such conference discusses a problem to form collectively decision-making, but the management level that is in a company is absolutely cannot be made with relying on to poll decision-making, for example the development direction of the company, still do not go up on a certain main product for example, on such great management decision-making it is absolutely can not rely on an Executive Board or president office meets such a few obedience is most polling to decide. The word that uses me will tell, make cannot rely on poll quite will run a company. Although the board of directors is trustee voting minority obedience is most, but its implicit meaning should be the way that there has been to make clear in president heart, go persuading the other director, most approve of in persuading director next his direction, so although decision-making be collective votes on the board of directors decision-making, but the meaning with its implicit backside is everybody certainly be in evidence president decision-making, what president guiding hopes everybody goes supporting him is decision-making. Run the level what be in a company daily, the level that meets in Executive Board and president office is want to put an end to absolutely rely on to poll come to those who vote to do.
Management company cannot be managed with voting means, why so will model tell? There is a position to decide an opinion by the side of here such process, will tell with common saying call the buttock decision head. Team member has field of his be assigned personal responsibility for, have oneself special skill or knowledge, so he can get necessarily he himself domain of be assigned personal responsibility for is affected to his. The position that the person that adieu conversion ponders over also puts him completely in a party to an undertaking without method goes up think, it is be assigned personal responsibility for no matter the team member of what, the level is again high, he is impossible also that complete conversion undertakes reflection to the president's height. Because have by the side of here so a truth, a position is when a party to an undertaking is very much, this position no matter the thinking that who takes that to be able to have a member locally, if an again tall person does not take the level in a party to an undertaking locally the thinking that he also won't have a member, because a party to an undertaking is the top chief of an organization, only then a party to an undertaking can see some height get, some choices have a party to an undertaking to be able to be made only, some determination have a party to an undertaking to be able to fall only, be absent its do not seek its politics, the team member with again high level if he is not a party to an undertaking, the height that he stands completely very hard also in a party to an undertaking will think of examine orally is inscribed and make a choice.
On the contrary, it is the most important to become a member is to should have an idea, everything must want to have his idea, have oneself make a decision. If do not have an idea, that is very troublesome. Of course the formation of this idea the process is to have a process, so we are told should hear most person opinion, want to hear everybody's opinion even, what is the purpose that hears these opinions then? It is to help oneself form a plan, go discussing with the small number of people next, what to discuss? It is the idea that expounds oneself, regard oneself PK adversary as others, if others can reverse his decision, so the idea that oneself can consider oneself afresh, if others cannot reverse his decision, that is more sturdy oneself idea. Our common saying says to want boldly hypothesis, seek testimony carefully, assume boldly even if oneself should form a judgement, want to take a definite view, seek testimony carefully next. When discussing with the small number of people, when seek others opinion, it is the process of a PK of the idea to oneself actually, the following that I often follow me people tell, I hope everybody expresses an opinion exceedingly, if I say YES, I hope all people will look to me can say NO, if I say the thing of NO, so everybody can go PK is YES, if everybody I won PK, I change the mind of myself, if everybody's PK cannot shake my argument, so I am met sturdy oneself idea. It is us no matter so we and small number of people still are when hearing most person opinion when discussing, should be a party to an undertaking had had his affirmatory idea actually, next this kind discusses, this kind listens the opinion just is in the definite view that seeks him testimony whether hold water.
I am emphasizing very much all the time, will tell to father, will tell to a party to an undertaking, those who want special him respect is instinctive. Myself has an experience, on the history always what I make is decision-making the intuition with myself and contrary when, basically final I these are decision-making prove be a mistake. Want to take oneself intuition seriously very so, but not be to say to rely on intuition to come decision-making, in fact I think should be to rely on intuition to come decide, seek the course of card carefully through next, through listening to great majority the person's opinion and with the small number of people discuss to hammer into shape, will beat, come him deliberate of instinctive generation such decision-making, if can be overthrown, so what you may be about to reconsider you is decision-making, if cannot be overthrown, your decision-making it is final decision-making. This is to regard an a party to an undertaking as a very important thing, allow when to await you to want to have your idea first namely, the opinion that goes listening to others next again is mixed and people discusses, and cannot say oneself do not have an idea, the opinion that accepts most person in the process that hears others opinion serves as his idea, in that way word is in namely actually rely on to poll, rely on a few obedient majority a kind of such means are being done decision-making with management company. This is a thing of special great risk, because the truth often masters in hand of small number of people, and manage to a company will tell, the decision-making ability that the high place that stands to a party to an undertaking only considers to come out can be correct decision-making, and this is planted decision-making must be coherent. So one stands to enough height, correct coherent decision-making only a party to an undertaking can be made. Do so decision-making, the plan that forms oneself and opinion this is a kind of responsibility with constitutional a party to an undertaking, you must assume this responsibility rise, this is a mission of a party to an undertaking.
One dare not become decision-making a member, he is not competent certainly. Do not do below most circumstance decision-making bigger than making the decision-making harm of the mistake, because you are not done decision-making be equal to did not act, the station did not act in place is forever won't resultful, then you were done decision-making can have the operation, even if is the decision-making mistake that you make, return actually likely final you obtain a result, why? You made even if wrong decision-making, you begin to carry out, so two is plant likelihood, one kind is the decision-making fault that in carrying out a process, you discover you, next you correct it come over, adjust correct decision-making, finally is resultful. That is additional a kind likelihood, be the reach the same goal by different routes in the process that you are carrying out, although decision-making be a mistake, but was done to be opposite in the process that do the reach the same goal by different routes in the process that perhaps doing, no matter how be told, only decision-making ability has the operation likely, only action ability get at amounts to destination, if actually he can drive not decision-making a party to an undertaking,whole organization is immersed in a kind to did not serve as a kind of such condition.
Say what organize as any to get military content to tell so, we should absorb everybody's good qualities already, want to have oneself sturdy idea again, and assume rise do decision-making a kind of such mission, that best method is the opinion that we hear most person, discuss with the small number of people next, final a person said to calculate, once was done decision-making, firm ground is driven go carry out and be being carried out.
This is a content that we should share today, we a party to an undertaking that all author are this enterprise actually, top chief, on this our everyone should hold well, modest the opinion that listens to others and discuss with others, and oneself are done decision-making, this 3 person the balance between and relation. That first-rate practice discussed a person to say to calculate with the small number of people only namely.
The content that this is today, thank everybody.
