With issue of leadership staff debate, one controversy forgets a word, how to do?

The problem hard to avoid with the hard to avoid in on-the-job field and other perhaps Wu of staff leadership obtain employment can have a controversy, obviously special the job that takes put in order, one dispute arises cerebrum with respect to a blank, the manage of skinful the evidence of skinful of what say not to come out, all forgot, waited for a controversy to end, think with respect to what, feel oneself very grievance very feel vexed, why can you appear this kind of circumstance? How should do again?

You if if mix your inferior controversy, you won't forget for certain, resembling is you are in the home and family are more powerful, you also won't forget, the problem is the colleague of you and unit, the problem is to often be in this to work in the same place, your mentally does not have what advantage, possible still the subjective superior that this colleague often is you, why? Because you see his side is tight, you value the process that argues with this too, you want to prove your to him, the ability that I am me what take put in order is correct, more such you can jump over insecurity. If you argue when, when facing pressure of such a kind of psychology, may short time won't have this kind of your state change, when one day you became superior, you hold psychological dominant position, you are not nervous of course, so this thing wants little to take exercise.

With issue of leadership staff debate, one controversy forgets a word, how to do?

But have the idea that can solve a problem relatively, one dispute arises your cerebra a blank, the other side all the time harp, you say this moment to go all right, I do not say to cross you really, you this one not reasonable, let you enrage me muddleheaded, you hide he is on bad terms he is reasonable, this moment you are slowly angry, think calmly a little while, want sufficient, write your argument on paper even, you go to this moment again look for him, the argument you one by one elaborate to him, this moment is not two individual controversies, however the viewpoint that your person is elaborating you, you are affirmative won't cerebrum is blank, because you are on paper,be being written.

With issue of leadership staff debate, one controversy forgets a word, how to do?

So this kind of means can allow the your better point of view that elaborates his, because insecurity forgets his footing,also won't say, through taking exercise slowly the psychology that adjusts oneself, can stand in reciprocity argue locally with the other side exculpatory problem.

With issue of leadership staff debate, one controversy forgets a word, how to do?

未经允许不得转载:News » With issue of leadership staff debate, one controversy forgets a word, how to do?