These two days, incident of spontaneous combustion of garage of one picket tesla, made heat news. Around move the safe problem of car, had attracted all circles expert to express respective point of view. And to many cars advocate for, what think of for a short while is personal question: Safe how compensate? And in accident process, by burn down additional two car, car advocate people it is to feel very innocent more, who should they look for to go theoretically? For this, south the opinion that the reporter consulted an expert.
Once appraisal is quality problem: Can be sure to manage compensate + manufacturer claim for compensation undertakes at the same time
The accident is late on April 21 20 when the left and right sides, shanghai Xu collects peaceful of Ou Yude road inside garage of underground of De Huayuan village, car of tesla of a black appears suddenly Bai Yan, quick cook meals burns after a few seconds. Result, the 3 cars on fire that causes tesla inside, the tesla of spontaneous combustion is marred serious, burn a remnant frame.
To incident of 21 days of late tesla spontaneous combustion, wu Yaoquan of source operation assistant inspector general points out Mian Che Xinneng, as a result of new energy resources at present the car has not publish exclusive insurance byelaw. Accordingly, manage compensate respect, those who adopt is to mix by traditional fuel car equal answer measure. Wu Yaoquan expresses, car advocate spontaneous combustion hind happens in car, need calls inn of insurance company, policeman, 4S and fire control department instantly. Involve on fire especially, the appraisal that fire control branch shows up to deflagrating incident is made, will serve as a car advocate the important legislation basis that thought of until of claim for compensation fors the time being.
To the car advocate people care most how compensate? Having compensate of old put in order to handle Introduction Wu Yaoquan of experience, if car advocate itself bought the spontaneous combustion a place difficult of access in additional risk, car is in jockey, charge the on fire of the experience in the process deflagrates phenomenon, can pass " spontaneous combustion danger " get compensate pays. In the meantime, can have claim for compensation to car manufacturer. If did not buy spontaneous combustion a place difficult of access, be about to see car whether be in national car inside 3 packets of limits, if can prove,be to attribute problem of system of batteries, electronic-controlled, electric machinery, bring about on fire to deflagrate, can be in brand car manufacturer to raise claim for compensation to car directly. If car advocate did not buy spontaneous combustion a place difficult of access, car also is keeping limits and car character inside limits of 3 packets of laws, can have claim for compensation to manufacturer. If car is not the spontaneous combustion that happens below static condition, deflagrate through what collision, ford causes however, apply to " car caustic danger " , get from insurance company place compensate pays.
Normal for, when the car advocate oneself car still is inside the expiration period, once happen below static condition,deflagrate accident. After fire control branch reachs the spot, the place that can choose to on fire has identification, the survey report that reachs finally, the butt joint comes down car advocate manage compensate Ji Weiquan, can serve as important basis. Nevertheless, up to now car of new energy resources does not have provision of special insurance manage compensate in the light of part of batteries, electronic-controlled, electric machinery, accordingly, the spontaneous combustion that these place cause, explosion, compensate byelaw all manages to treat related the component according to traditional fuel car.
"Disaster and pool fish " additional two cars look for whose compensate
In incident of this tesla spontaneous combustion, still two park are reached by disaster in the car on the side of tesla. To this, wu Yaoquan tells south reporter, actually, these two damaged car, can pass " danger of tripartite responsibility " to tesla car advocate raise claim for compensation. And tesla car advocate after appraisal result comes out, once confirm " spontaneous combustion " the accident attributes problem of car itself quality really, also be raise claim for compensation to tesla, come by the manufacturer that produces quality problem " buy sheet " .
Incident of this second spontaneous combustion, still involve experience thing car advocate how much does specified amount of bought risk of tripartite responsibility spend, what reach like disaster of this tesla spontaneous combustion is additional two cars are luxurious car, after the course assesses value, if add up to valuation to be worth the specified amount that buys in danger of tripartite responsibility,spend limits inside, can pass danger of tripartite responsibility to undertake manage compensate directly. And once be damaged the overbalance of car the highest forehead of danger of tripartite responsibility is spent, so, assume besides insurance company should the specified amount that compensate pays is spent, exceed a share, the car of stricken be hit by a natural adversity car advocate, should the tesla car to spontaneous combustion advocate have claim for compensation. Actually, when this car advocate can pass relevant appraisal result, the car that proves oneself belongs to quality problem truly, be equivalent to paying amount the compensate of this part, will assume by tesla manufacturer. Once experience thing car did not buy a place difficult of access of tripartite responsibility, OK also accident appraisal responsibility square who is belonged to, carry the kind of compensate of insurance company manage, obtain corresponding compensate to pay, the car manufacturer claim for compensation that is in to problem quality.
Of course, still have a kind of case, need by tesla car advocate bear the blame, include other the loss of two cars, by the car advocate oneself will buy sheet. Tesla car advocate did not buy any car danger to plant, in the meantime, through accident appraisal, have enough evidential proof, as a result of,be tesla car advocate oneself once produced damage in use car process, have to this spontaneous combustion accident causal, satisfying these two kinds of conditions to fall at the same time, tesla car advocate just cannot seek insurance company manage compensate, also cannot denounce a view to tesla manufacturer, oneself recoup the loss that additionally two car that be burned cause even.
Interview and write: South of reporter Liang Luo
