Author | Feline father's younger brother
Frequency of 2 minutes of nearsightedness by make free with at advertisement, famous from media " " the compensation that be sentenced 500 thousand.
2 minutes, 500 thousand!
This has been " copyright law " the ceiling that concerns legal compensation, also be up to now individual nearsightedness frequency sentences compensate amount case of highest copyright dimension authority.
As " nearsightedness frequency tort the first case " , the trial result of this case, after will be opposite the transmission of nearsightedness frequency, reprint, use demarcation, for nearsightedness frequency dimension authority provides reference, be opposite possibly also in nearsightedness frequency many " bearer " , cause annihilative blow.
Tort 2 minutes, compensate for 500 thousand
Sentence compensate according to statutory ceiling
The court thinks via cognizance, experience case video although when long shorter, but by the person that film use major is photographed film like equipment, and will many film material editing and rearrangement is combined and become, of video film and the intellective achievement of the person that editing and rearrangement reflected creative work, belong to have kind of Promethean report work.
2 minutes of video, 500 thousand compensation, be after all how decide?
The court thinks, although both sides submitted relevant evidence, but the illegal earning of the actual loss that all can't prove Mr Liu or a company, so the court considered 4 essential factor integratedly:
1, experience case video is Mr Liu use professional equipment to film and editing and rearrangement and into, the relevant picture that video will draw ski of He Chongli of car of some brand new fund oneself is united in wedlock, better through the camera lens such as close-up land showed the trait of the car, it is certain to have Promethean with advertisement value;
2, the advertisement that a company regards this brand as new fund car experience case video, have transmission through small letter and small gain, get commercial benefit directly;
3, the accrual evidence of video of case of experience of hold of behoove of a company, but its refus is not referred, its approbate according to advertisement print exemple quoted 2018, the quote of small gain transmission that is not custom-built video is every 100 thousand yuan, quote of small letter transmission is every 100 thousand yuan reach 150 thousand yuan, advertisement collects fees amount is higher;
4, a company parted to release experience case video in small gain and small letter on March 18, 2018, when obtaining evidence to Mr Liu notarization, read volume accumulative total 400 thousand above, and a company deletes experience case video not in time after receiving this case to sue material, cause tort behavior to last to all the time in September 2018, tort incidence is subjective and big, baleful apparent.
Integrated above element, haidian court thinks this case should undertake sentencing compensate according to the ceiling of legal compensation, reason lawfully take into consideration the circumstances decides pecuniary loss is 500 thousand yuan.
2 minutes, 500 thousand, this top case sentences the price of compensate, let hearten of the person that achieve formerly really, probably will ecbolic lawsuit of more authority of nearsightedness frequency dimension.
Fall from passivity frame, counterpoise to active dimension,
Nearsightedness frequency suffers " copyright law " protection
Appear such case is not accidental.
According to relevant statistic, up to in June 2018, video user dimensions is amounted to 609 million, occupy a netizen 76% overall. Nearsightedness frequency was to become Internet more newest " discharge flat " , surprise even love art, the traditional video website such as actor cruel also is entered in succession bureau, encourage content of frequency of high grade nearsightedness pay fee.
As the generation of many nearsightedness frequency, in the past, tort is almost inevitable, everybody has counted normal state, the person that thought fors the time being is very few, hit tort radical one's job to be able to rely on national copyright bureau talk about and warn.
On September 14, 2018, national copyright bureau talked to shake video of sound, quick worker, watermelon, volcanic small video to wait for platform of 15 nearsightedness frequency about, fall in all frame delete of all kinds be suspected of work of frequency of nearsightedness of tort pilfer edition 570 thousand, partial Zhang date by permanent ban or buckle cent to ban speech.
Was September 2018 likewise, because of the short video of a 15 seconds, shake phonic general Baidu to tell a court.
The reason is Baidu do sth without authorization will shake a on sound " black face V " the nearsightedness frequency that substantive creative work finishs " 5.12, I want to say to you " , reprinted a banner to fall " partner send small video " , provide download service. Shake phonic requirement Baidu to stop tort, recoup pecuniary loss 1 million yuan reach lawsuit reasonable defray 50 thousand yuan, what obtain the person that compensation gives creative work sum pass on.
Tremble this sound sue Baidu, be undertake with respect to nearsightedness frequency copyright between two big platform first lawsuit, must be faced for the first time so and li is a few clearer problem, for instance:
Whether does nearsightedness frequency form original creative work to taste?
How is the copyright of nearsightedness frequency limitted, how does originality trace to the source?
If form tort, it is the tort that reprints the person that upload, be still platform also has joint liability?
Between nearsightedness frequency platform, where is the right border between nearsightedness frequency platform and user?
Is the loss of 1 million how of numerate?
On December 26, 2018, first instance of Beijing Internet court adjudicates, baidu serves the person that offer as the network, do not have subjective fault, fulfilling " announcement - delete " after obligation, do not form tort, should not assume relevant responsibility, reject shake entire lawsuit request of sound.
Although because " port principle " , tremble sound lose a lawsuit, but commendable is, the court gives nearsightedness frequency first qualitative, have Promethean short video, belong to " kind electric work " , also get copyright law protection naturally.
Decide video tort, do not depend on program accident, and depend on Promethean
Advanced article place states case in, mr Liu can win compensation of high specified number, because the short video of its creation is considered as to belong to,be -- have Promethean " kind electric work " .
According to explanation of Beijing Internet court, whether nearsightedness frequency is in judgement " kind electric work " when, see work whether be had above all " Promethean " , include: 1, whether to finish independently by the author; 2, whether to have " creation sex " .
Whether to accord with " in judgement when the independent " that finish asks, whether should exist with the nearsightedness frequency of nearsightedness frequency and other and same theme the difference that can be distinguished objectively is a condition, the theme is same do not affect nearsightedness frequency to whether fasten what finish independently to maintain;
Whether to accord with " to create sexual " in judgement when the requirement, the accident of nearsightedness frequency decides with what create a gender without inevitable connection; Below the state that gives theme and material, its create a space to be restricted certainly, body reveals creation sexual difficulty is taller; It is OK that nearsightedness frequency band is enjoyed to the spirit of the audience the consideration factor that has creation sex as nearsightedness frequency.
On creation sex, the creation that is based on nearsightedness frequency and transmission conduce to the prosperity of diversity expression of the public and culture, when whether reason accords with creation sex to ask to undertake judging to nearsightedness frequency, should not be exacting to writing height, want to be able to reflect the individuation that gives producer convey only, can maintain its to have creation sex.
That is to say, the accident of video, do not affect the protection to copyright. Should have only " Promethean " , again short video, also have copyright.
Current, the copyright of domestic nearsightedness frequency is protected, still be in exploration period. Nearsightedness frequency sort is multifarious, have collection kind, education kind, imitate kind, achieve originality formerly kind etc, not be each nearsightedness frequency can count " kind electric work " , but once be maintained to be " kind electric work " , can get " copyright law " protection.
Consciousness of nearsightedness frequency copyright is in arousal,
"Bearer " should rest rested!
Since nearsightedness frequency platform rise abruptly, copyright issue is all the time, each platform user is reprinted at will, editing and rearrangement, borrowed become a common practice, without permitting do sth without authorization transmission already became normal state, and the old practice that frequency of a lot of nearsightedness uses likeness even, originality and film gimmick.
Because of nearsightedness frequency " short " , so everybody does not feel to have what problem so, basically did not form copyright consciousness, appeared even the short person inspect frequency operation of a kind of major -- " bearer " .
In nearsightedness frequency cruel the initial stage that grow, once popularity passes a word -- we do not produce content, we become the bearer of content only. Of countless " bearer " emerge as the times require, active at platform of each big short video, some made a net even red.
As " nearsightedness frequency tort the first case " , the result of this case, have the copyright standard to whole industry fair referenced value, the value of nearsightedness frequency will get attention further, those should not answer the person that achieve formerly of the thing " bearer " people, should rest rested!
500 thousand, perhaps be nearsightedness frequency tort opens the first piece when go out to punish sheet, but what can imagine is, after copyright consciousness arousal, next, similar dimension power bill will be increasing.
- END-
Smell out explodes dot, take the fact.
