Because refus does not implement forensic court decision,face Fen much person, be sentenced, amerce!_News

Refus hold be afraid of into punishment be afraid of?

It is gally gally person!

Need not be afraid of, much cry and little wool!

NO!

Court of people of Yao Dou division releases refus 5 cases hold exemple of a criminal case

Let Laolai know

Entering punishment is not to say just!

Typical case one: Li Mou refus does not carry out blame of court decision, ruling

Accuser Han is such-and-such, yang Mou some and dispute of contract of business of the accused Li Mou one case, via the court cognizance enters a judgement, sentence the accused Li Mou to return Han to such-and-such, Yang Mou reachs accrual 6.4 million yuan some and pay new hyperplasia to produce equipment money 591218.78 yuan at adjudicating become effective hind is returned inside 10 days. After Li Mou appeals, nolle prosequi, both sides presses original court decision to carry out.

During application is carried out compulsively, what copy clerk of law of become effective of nonperformance of refus of Li Mou of person be executived decides is compulsory, overcome its industry of cotton of spring of weather of Su De area in Xinjiang A the share of limited company changes its brother under one's name. Public security mechanism detained Li Mou criminal on October 24, 2017, on October 30, 2017, the little brother of Li Mou of the accused person and Han Mou reach intercessory agreement, by the accused one-time pay Han Mou 5 million yuan, han Mou expresses to forgive to the behavior of the accused person. On August 13, 2018 procuratorate to this academy to sue, via the court cognizance thinks Li Mou of the accused person is right the become effective court decision of people court is capable to carry out and refus is not carried out, the clue is serious, its behavior already formed refus not to carry out adjudicative blame, sentence a set term of imprisonment one year 6 months, probation 2 years.

Typical case 2: Refus of Liu some dimension does not carry out blame of court decision, ruling

Leasehold dispute of folk of dimension of Liu Mou of accuser Zhang Mou and the accused one case, via the court cognizance enters a judgement, sentence some dimension of Liu of the accused person to remand Zhang Mou loan reachs accrual 510 thousand yuan. During application is carried out compulsively, dimension of Liu Mou of person be executived transfers property in executive process, privately applies for one place house property change the name of owner in a register to give Xun Mou, repudiate obligation.

On January 8, 2019 procuratorate to this academy to sue, during cognizance, some carries out some dimension of Liu of the accused person and Zhang Mou, Shi Mou one case comes to an agreement, obtain forgive, some dimension of Liu of the accused person is active pay fine 5000 yuan. Via the court cognizance thinks some dimension of Liu of the accused person is right the become effective court decision of people court is capable to carry out and refus is not carried out, conceal, move belongings, the clue is serious, its behavior already formed refus not to carry out blame of court decision, ruling, sentence some dimension of the accused Liu to make refus do not carry out blame of court decision, ruling, condemn fine 5000 yuan.

Typical case 3: Han Mou defends refus not to carry out blame of court decision, ruling

Some and some the accused Han Mou defend accuser Xu property damages dispute one case, via the court cognizance enters a judgement, sentence the accused Han Mou to defend after adjudicative become effective advance Chang'an minibus returns LAC366 to still give accuser Xu Mou inside 5 days some. The Court of Cassation after the accused appeals rejects appeal and maintain original judgement. During applying for to carry out after, some defends Han of person be executived to reject to carry out to sequestered ruling. Public security mechanism defended Han Mou criminal to detain on October 8, 2018, on October 14, 2018, the wife that Han Mou of the accused person defends and Xu are such-and-such civil compensation comes to an agreement partly, by the accused person Han Mou defends one-time compensation Xu such-and-such car section 35000 yuan, finish this dispute, the action that defends to Han Mou of the accused person expresses to forgive. On December 20, 2018 procuratorate to this academy to sue, the become effective court decision that via the court cognizance thinks Han Mou of the accused person defends pair of people courts is capable to carry out and refus is not carried out, the clue is serious, its behavior already formed refus not to carry out adjudicative blame, sentence the accused Han Mou to defend make refus do not carry out adjudicative blame, sentence Han Mou to defend arrest service 4 months, probation 4 months.

Typical case 4: Xu Mou child, fragrant refus does not carry out Wang Mou blame of court decision, ruling

Accuser Xu such-and-such, Jing Mou some and child of Xu Mou of the accused person, wang Mou fragrant remove obstructive issue one case, via the court cognizance enters a judgement, instruct secondly the person is moved instantly be located in bourg of Liu of Yao Dou district of the city that face Fen street of center of Kong Jiazhuang village 13 compound, return return other. During application is carried out compulsively, court of people of Yao Dou division grants to its executive advice note, secondly the person adjudicates because of be opposite the result disagrees and repudiate, on October 10, 2018 procuratorate to this academy to sue, during cognizance, some child of Xu of the accused person, wang Mou fragrant all express to be willing to adopt measure to fulfil executive obligation, go up to cooperate this academy actively to carry out case staff member to work with respect to executive means and time. Via the court cognizance thinks some child of Xu of the accused person, wang Mou fragrant capable to the become effective court decision of people court to carry out and refus is not carried out, the clue is serious, its behavior already formed refus not to carry out adjudicative blame, sentence battle of arrest of Xu Mou child 6 months, probation 8 months, sentence Wang Mou fragrant arrest battle 6 months, probation 8 months.

Typical case 5: Hao Mou happy refus does not carry out blame of court decision, ruling

Accuser is tall some and some the accused Hao Mou are happy remove obstructive issue one case, via the court cognizance enters a judgement, sentence the accused to be in adjudicative become effective will be built in tall such-and-such building inside 10 days east wall 17.7 meters with north 3.4 meters wide, 12.9 meters long curtilage the building proper motion inside base limits is demolished, restorable. During application is carried out compulsively, classics court urges for many times, hao Mou is happy dismantle partial structure only, not restorable. On December 29, 2018 procuratorate to this academy to sue, faced circumstance of public security bureau of Fen city Yao Dou district to explain on March 21, 2019: Hao Mou is happy demolish what fulfill in judgment content entirely fulfill. Via the court cognizance thinks Hao Mou of the accused person is happy capable to the become effective court decision of people court to carry out and refus is not carried out, the clue is serious, its behavior already formed refus not to carry out blame of court decision, ruling, sentence defendant Hao Mou is happy make refus do not carry out blame of court decision, ruling, sentence battle of Hao Mou happy arrest 5 months, probation 6 months.