[Chinese dress encircles · 1696 period]
The COMME MOI of brand of Lv Yan exceeding a standard's individual that the near future causes height to pay close attention to in domestic style group and Shenzhen shadow between fashionable group borrowed dispute still is in ferment continuously. (Recommend read: COMME MOI sues Shenzhen shadow vogue is suspected of borroweding)
After incident influence expands, also the netizen gathers up on the net work of swallow giving Lv is suspected of borroweding the action that includes the international brand such as Alexander McQueen, Valentino.
Before this, shadow fashionable group ever published outgiving to express, dress originality research and development comes from popular trend, be pointed to to borrowed without legal basis.
On April 30 shadow the group publishs statement the 2nd times, think " Lv Yan is, shadow of already serious effect image of fashionable group brand, affected an image fashionable group is normal operation order, create huge brand business praise with economic profit loss. " expressing to will sue Lv Yan and Shanghai formally is your trade limited company encroachs a shadow the reputation of dress of card of inferior of fashionable group and banner counterpoises, and bespatter shadow the commercial reputation ill will of fashionable group is shocking the tort behavior such as competition, investigate its law duty, recover loss of a huge sum lawfully.
On May 5 Shenzhen shadow fashionable group is formal to Shenzhen city to lodge a complaint of intermediate people court requests, censure a shadow on small gain for many times with respect to Lv Yan exceeding a standard the group is " copy copy a group " , create a vague impression the group weighs big reputation loss and be related of pecuniary loss of a huge sum, sueing swallow of Lv exceeding a standard and its company Shanghai is your trade limited company unfair competition, ask two the accused suspend tort action instantly, recoup pecuniary loss 10 million yuan, apologize publicly.
Legal personage points out, from the point of the evidence that at present Lv Yan publishs, lv Yan censures a shadow borrowed not only not sufficient and evidence is not contented the condition that the basiccest judgement borroweds, and what crucial point of the thing wants to prove this is her above all in Yu Lvyan is former achieve, the intellectual property that owns legal effectiveness namely is relevant the right.
