This story is returned get on first pieces from human history " black hole " the photograph speaks of. This piece of photograph caused the heat of netizens to discuss on the network at that time. Can have netizen discovery subsequently, visual China brought into this piece of picture his graph library unexpectedly, returning threaten to say his is the copyright that obtains through legal approach. Our for the moment does not discuss this issue true and false, can netizens express: Visual China appears the watermark that the picture such as Chinese ensign, national emblem, black hole hits visual China on visual China website, and copyright does not belong to visual China again however.
Say so, does visual China rely on a scampish company that mean shift engages in a lawsuit and lives namely? Go up for this network from media people begin to undertake criticism to visual China in succession, still came to " China of the world bitter vision is long " ! Did we see this company what kind of business do after all below?
Visual China also is to be in after experiencing this thing, amerce was handed in, rectify and reform also changed 30 days. Some more advanced the talent just returns to masses line of sight. But there is emersion today hegemony. That is visual China sues others tort again. Visual China thinks his a few pictures are given to embezzle by a hospital, immediately told his the court. Request court sentences the accused to delete and disuse tort work, compensatory accuser loss 40000 yuan, add up to sleave to raise 2000 yuan, add up to 42000 yuan
Accuser thinks, of the person that the work of experience case photography that the accused uses showed photography achieve a gender formerly, be not pure only the mechanical emersion of hypostatic person, content.
In front courtyard careful, the accused says, the picture that oneself use is the download on Baidu, it is open, there is provenance when download, without origin,
The accused still thinks, oneself are a blame seeks profits the gender is public hospital, these pictures are used on Guan Wei, basically use at the Xuan Xuan of healthy knowledge to pass, belong to reasonable use. And number of hospital official small attention, read a quantity finite, did not cause actual loss. This matter caused the heat of netizens to discuss on the network again! So we no matter who hits this one lawsuit,won first, we are analysed in light of today, a when do what kind of business is visual China after all?
How does visual China earn money?
Above all, visual China is China besides the biggest picture company beyond Xinhua News Agency. So this also showed visual China is a normal and legal firm. And visual China still basically relies on picture copyright to earn money. For instance once visual China discovers his picture by tort, can give lawyer of make known to lower levels of tort one party letter so. So the issue came, how is visual China to know his picture is had by tort? Want to know now is times of a big data, a lot of things just let you want to be less than, do not do without what!
According to the view of visual China government: Their interior has a system to cry " accipitral eye " ! The use condition that this tracks the picture that has to the company to go up in the network quite not only, the lock decides potential client and satisfy its requirement better, implementation essence follows sale, reduced the cost that win a customer greatly, implementation client amount grows considerably. How to wear? This is the rhythm that person and boy become supreme ruler together!
How this company of China of look upon vision
How to say? To copyright consciousness, I feel special still to approbate! For instance we see video, Internet listen to a song to wait now, these metropolises have copyright, and now 95 and 00 hind be willing to buy sheet for this more, because they feel,this is the pay that others should win. So, the copyright business to visual China I agree. But scampish to visual China like extortionate. I believe nobody can agree, how, each Laotie, about visual China this company, what kind of view do you have again? Welcome a criticism!
