Minor enters red light, doesn't the photograph have an exposure lawful really?

Minor enters red light, doesn't the photograph have an exposure lawful really?

Graph article has nothing to do. Film cut pursues.

Recently, shanxi Taiyuan had crossing to install screen, exposure enters the pedestrian of red light. Besides the photograph of adult, concerned branch has not made minor picture the code be revealed directly go up in screen. Local policeman branch expresses, minor and adult are same, should break the law only enter red light to be able to be revealed by exposure a week left and right sides.

"Enter red light to go up big screen " , do not need to increase too much execute the law cost, can increase public opinion pressure at virtually however, raise the illegal cost of the person that enter red light, go up objectively be helpful for keep within limits violating those who enter red light chaos to resemble to cause spread.

The problem is, execute the law and cannot simple " one boiler is boiled " , also do to minor so called " treat equally without discrimination " , be worth deliberate.

Undeniable, everybody is equal before law, enter driveway of red light cross, it is minor, also become the person that break the law euqally, ought to according to " law of road transportation safety " regulation, conscientiously ground accepts administrative punishment.

But the specific identity of minor decided, they can get law some kind " wide excuse " . Basis " administration sanctions a method " , malcontent the person of 14 one full year of life has illegal action, "Do not grant administration is punished " ; Full already 14 one full year of life are malcontent the person of 18 one full year of life has illegal action, "Perhaps reduce administration lightly to punish " .

Not only such, as minor, the character right such as their effigies authority, privacy right, more get strict protection of law. " minor protects a law " specific provision, "Any organize or the individual privacy that the individual must not announce minor " .

Local policeman branch makes public exposure their did not make a picture, and last on big screen a week time, the identity information that means concerned minor is made public " exposure " , individual privacy gets enroach on. Look from the lawful sex that execute the law, such " indiscriminate punishment " practice, have apparently break appropriate.

On the net, some people think " the age won't be chosen when traffic accident happens " . Listen be like rational, but actually, raise minor not to charge the autonomic sex of red light, "Exposure does not make a picture " be not only way.

For instance, to entering the minor of red light, besides let them accept " lightweight " administrative punishment, still can consider to will violate a condition " copy to " family, let a family cooperate to criticize education. Compared with it is under a public occasion " lose face lose face " , this won't destroy legal majesty not only, weaken execute the law might, return can better land to protect the privacy of minor and dignity.

Law society, execute the law behavior must strict lawfully and for, avoid " break the law in order to violate law " trap. Enter red light to the pedestrian, many a little bit execute the law innovation is no problem, but premise must be to be below legal frame.

□ Liu Yuting (scholar)

Edit Chen Jing to proofread Wei Zhuo

未经允许不得转载:News » Minor enters red light, doesn't the photograph have an exposure lawful really?