On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, y

The mensal culture of our country is more still, still remember be when I am small, having a meal cannot have leftover absolutely, otherwise the grandfather has to come over hammer, still the chopstick cannot point to others, it is so a kind extremely clodhopping behavior, when having a meal anyway must decorous oneself manner, word also cannot too much, the place that takes repeatedly is having great and exquisite, await your rebuke that will be one's elders person otherwise.

On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, you most be fed up with which kind of?

Among numerous mensal culture, those who make my impression the deepest is to concern at the chopstick, regular meeting of classics of one's elders person chatters in the mouth, say the girl has a meal the chopstick must be taken a few higher, after be being taken higher, can marry weller! So is this kind of view true? Anyway my individual is to become aware the move is not quite effective, because the village still has a lot of girl, just also married those who sell deep-fried twisted dough sticks finally.

On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, you most be fed up with which kind of?

These still are a few better regulation, but there still is a few on table at the same time bad, your person feels cheesed behavior, for example on dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, you most be fed up with which kind of?

On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, you most be fed up with which kind of?

1, the first kind is more action appears on feast, that is fooled namely grab dish to taste, a good food is firm on desk still do not have a few seconds, dishes whole are dropped for nothing, the person that reaction perhaps takes a bit slow a bit far again, can saying is the appearance that tastes even dish did not see, more nevering mention it is to taste, most propbably of this kind of behavior everybody should be very be fed up with.

On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, you most be fed up with which kind of?

2, the 2nd kind word is one kind bales behavior, baling normally is the behavior of a kind of managing commissariat, be worth to advocate of course, but always have so the person of one fraction, their bale or allowable " loot " will describe meeting more a few apter, fool on table namely simply grab! When having even, eat of big housekeeping money still does not have an end, take bag to taste dish " bale " be installed, it is really very without language.

On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, you most be fed up with which kind of?

3, the 3rd kind is the behavior that those know to take care of him child only, look after children to eat feast together, the course that takes a dot to like to eat more to the child is tasted, everybody is understandable, also be willing self-effacing eat to children, but of parenthood a dish whole, even several dishes, take the child entirely in front of, let the child be being caught with the hand eat, is this a little beyond the mark? Should people have even?

On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, you most be fed up with which kind of?

Above these 3 kinds of behavior, I think even if on table most let what the person bores, which kinds had you come up against? Is are you the most cheesed which are planted?

未经允许不得转载:News » On dining table most 3 kinds of action that allow a person to detest, look to do not have quality, y