Recently, arrange of American environmental protection (EPA) scientific and advisory vote is right a series of controversy sex regulation that this orgnaization offerred 8 months in the past undertake evaluating. They include to be able to be used restriction by EPA for environmental code " attest " the plan that studies a type scientificly, and cancel what greenhouse gas discharges limitation to offer. Among them, newest policy will prevent EPA to rely on the research that includes any blame to publish data. EPA arrange long Scott Pruitt regards this data regulation as drive transparency tries hard and object " secret science " one part.
This by EPA scientific advisory committee (SAB) the evaluates regulation decision that make, it is what to after a few members offer criticism to these regulation, this orgnaization comes is in before this. In the memorandum book that published on May 12, EPA of blame of working group of a SAB did not offer these to refer committee to evaluate.
"The working group supports transparency very much. " Alison Cullen of researcher of sanitation of environment of university of working group chairman, Washington expresses on SAB conference. But about transparency specific offer, "How will be lacked extremely by applied respect in its definition " .
A when offerred transparency stipulates with American Boule republican party Moses is driven for years similar proposal is a model. Boule passed the newest version of this act 2017, but it " die at " senatorial.
Scientist and environmentalist condemn EPA all the time offer. They think, a lot of important epidemiology consider to stem from privacy to consider and cannot be a foundation with the communal and wholesome data that publishs legally. Then, the person that criticize thinks, this kind of regulation will prevent EPA to consider a few best wholesome research, make finally found new environmental code to become more difficult thereby.
Advanced a few act as deputy are chief during holding a post, EPA informs SAB wants to take superintendency move ahead of schedule normally, although law is done not have,ask so do. The meeting that holds recently is regulation of transparency of consideration of first time of whole expert team. EPA was not asked the proposal of comply with advisory committee, but if be not being done so, may raise the legal challenge that is aimed at this orgnaization.
EPA has not decide the content of transparency regulation finally: The date of expiration that collects public opinion is initial on May 30, but already was lengthened at present on August 16. (Zong Hua)
" Chinese science signs up for " (2018-06-07 international of the 3rd edition)
