Such belongings of | of legal common sense agrees content is invalid

Such belongings of | of legal common sense agrees content is invalid

Mr Zhang and Miss Liu are registered agreement of a belongings was signed when marrying, agreement agreed to be mixed before marriage the attributive problem of the belongings inside marriage, return an agreement: "If one party puts forward to divorce, clean body produces door " . Went 4 years, because both sides often produces contradiction, live jointly hard, mr Zhang puts forward to divorce to Miss Liu, miss Liu takes out an agreement to ask Mr Zhang goes out personally completely door, both sides produces issue accordingly.

Such belongings of | of legal common sense agrees content is invalid

According to the regulation of marriage law, during husband and wife can agree marital relation puts add the belongings before the belongings of earning and marriage returns collective and respective and all, all or the part is respective the part is collective and all, all.

The agreement department both sides of Mr Zhang and Miss Liu signs approbate, and also do not have con, threatening clue, so the content of agreement ought to be bilateral and true meaning expresses. But, in agreement " if one party puts forward to divorce, clean body produces door " agreement, limitted the freedom that other divorces, disable because of lawbreaking regulation and principle of common of public order fine, but its disable not to affect agreement the effectiveness of other item.

We notice, partial person is before marriage or belongings agreement is signed inside marriage, and " who mentions a divorce, who goes out personally completely door " , often make the provision in belongings agreement, with making both sides dare not have the idea of the divorce easily. Such jumping-off place is good probably, but should understand, marriage is to should rely on bilateral intention to run ability may long.

未经允许不得转载:News » Such belongings of | of legal common sense agrees content is invalid