What is the risk with 2018 the biggest world cups? Not be Mei Luo is about to retire, also not be whose whose meeting plays black base, however the VAR of famous.
Video assistant judgment applies Yu Dejia, meaning armour, and some East Asia is burgeoning after league matches, looking also was to avoid a lot of controversy, but brought more controversy essentially: As in exceed kind of awkward appearance that takes a ball to be about to watch a video, one cannot say for sure won't be in the crucial showing number of the world cup, or the moment of truth appears; Big fight of a focus fouls amphibolously a few times, can delay competition of 90 minutes to resembled playing the game when adding.
[one of risks: Offside scores a goal]
In some strong strong dialog, the 89th minute of support grows pass strike back, some forward run down hits the ball into after adversary full back, then, all players and coach did not fight opponent, all fan also breath out slowly sonic boom day, although international sufficient couplet gave a judgment to whether use the absolutely authority of VAR, but so enormous pressure, still be unavoidable to draw a pane, watch video!
Then, it is to give a goal to answer put picture originally, the instant cut a judgment that dull big face, big fellow of a flock of foot of dig or dig out with a finger or sth pointed in VAR video atelier look at electronic screen in pop eye, setting still is the catcall with endless fan.
Does VAR look to be over? Not, juridical or change the original sentence, or not change the original sentence, but no matter ending how, always have train of player of one party fan the meeting is dissatisfactory, then even academic a little while.
So do sth over and over again, 3 went to 5 minutes, basic also be the injury stays the time when filling.
If is in the 92nd minute when, the other side advanced a controversy ball again, or offside or interference goalkeeper, perhaps foul, the catcall of shake day, and the moment of truth of the match, the judgment comes extremely likely again.
This catcall is bigger, theory is more. Look again? Be equal to when hitting half of a game or contest to add, the player is tired, the judge is irritated.
[risk 2: Dot ball and diving are sentenced punish]
Be bit of ball or diving? This is a problem.
Numerous VAR also cannot look completely foul inside reasonable reserve, be destined to be able to make the time bomb of the world cup. Those who had played a ball should be clear, a little light body is contacted, even if the player that comes up against high speed to run, may centre of gravity is lost, but won't fall down immediately, be over all-pervasive enough ego is adjusted.
But be in this is unapt fall down instantly when the mouth, "Clever " adversary, intended the body one lets you be brushed, make next lose account of centre of gravity.
This is not the problem that VAR can solve. Although left and right sides of 20 camera around looks, also may be a foot really " loiter " , "Block " arrived adversary.
Of this kind of a nuisance amphibolous, in controlling knockout extremely likely, some raises the destiny of powerful group.
? The original idea of VAR is time of sacrificial part game, will exchange the match more just, its are instead as a result: Those who sacrifice is part-time can not change certainly accurate sentence punish, let broken up of whole consecutive game however instead, let player coach because of VAR still more physical strength are used up (after juridical amend a judgment often the player runs more even) , on the technology take pain to not to please, on regulation ambiguous not clear, the member that still have an alien is applied to the judgment press VAR application.
Russia world cup, extremely possible big because of VAR stricken.
