The size of door of guard against theft that Mr Zhao thinks home of neighbour king lady is installed newly is too large, hampered the discrepancy of its and family, both sides talks things over for many times not if really, mr Zhao appeals to Ms. Wang after to the court, ask Ms. Wang stops tort, its installation of door of guard against theft is inside wall body, do not get the metope outside tower above, lest affect pass in and out. A few days ago, haidian court careful writtened guarantee this case. Lady of king of forensic court decision is right Bao Bian undertakes transforming on the right side of door of building guard against theft, make this include a margin no longer with Mr Zhao home enter a door happening to blow loiter.
Accuser Mr Zhao appeals to say, of his home enter a door and Ms. Wang home enter a door to be endured very nearly. In December 2017, ms. Wang was installed enter a gate of guard against theft newly, door of this guard against theft is wide give doorcase 20 centimeters, the metope outside tower above 3.3 centimeters, the door of guard against theft that causes his home cannot normal switch, his home grandchildren ever still was placed to cut a hand accordingly. The embezzlement of door of guard against theft that he thinks Ms. Wang is installed public section, affected his home to enter a gate use, and the dimension of door of guard against theft of downstair and other home was not like this " luxurious " , ms. Wang should undertake transforming to door of guard against theft, it is normal to make he and domestic person OK pass in and out.
Argue of lady of the accused king says, in November 2017, she ever thought installation is left outside the door of guard against theft that opens type, mr Zhao is opposite this by every means obstruct, concern considering neighborhood, she chose to install right outside door of guard against theft opening type, the other side in process of installation of door of guard against theft not demur, installation personnel is mature also the space that enters a gate with the other side, undertook leaving closing checking. Ms. Wang thinks door of guard against theft won't be caused to Mr Zhao cloggy, doorcase of present door of guard against theft is outstanding come, highlight downstairs less because the quality of the door is poor,be, door of good guard against theft can highlight certain height.
The court maintains after classics cognizance: The pattern that experience appeals to 3 to Lou Yu is one ladder, via each right-hand man when the layer reaching on stair each have, enter a door to lie between corridor opposite, among enter a door to face stair and stand by the right hand, doorcase span makes an appointment with intermediate doorcase and right hand 30 centimeters. The right hand side that building of Mr Zhao home is this floor, building of Ms. Wang home fastens this among.
The door of guard against theft of building of Mr Zhao home is door of guard against theft of old money of left hand model, the 1/4 usable bolt on the right side of the door locks up decided doorcase, thereby can only 3/4 open door is left. Ms. Wang was installed for its building in December 2017 enter a gate of guard against theft newly, door of this guard against theft is on the right side of open, the doorcase that matchs about 4 centimeters to doorcase of about 12 centimeters wide, tower above is in metope includes a margin. The doorcase that Mr Zhao home is apart from by the side of the doorcase bag that shows Ms. Wang home makes an appointment with 16 centimeters. Of Mr Zhao home enter a gate only open 3/4 when the least space of Bao Bian is not worth 1 centimeter on the right side of the door of guard against theft with Ms. Wang home, but won't happen blow loiter, the when entering a door to be opened entirely top left corner of Mr Zhao home wraps an edge to blow loiter on the right side of the door of guard against theft of meeting and Ms. Wang home, but still can open.
Additional, inquiry of the staff after Ms. Wang ever called carry out can deny doors of pair of its guard against theft to undertake transforming, the other side says to be able to cost more than yuan of 200 a side door of guard against theft to wrap an edge to curium. But Ms. Wang thinks to curium after edge of stealthily substitute one thing for another not beautiful, insecure, reason does not agree to undertake afore-mentioned transforming. After front courtyard careful, the court calls staff of the sale of door of the guard against theft on day, installation, the main function that the other side weighs to door of guard against theft includes a margin depends on beautiful, can demolish through making the door, hind the height that move or excises a part to Bao Bian's means revises Bao Biankuan to spend or highlight metope, if be excised only,the part needs to pay 300 yuan of fee to 400 yuan by the side of the bag.
The court thinks after classics cognizance, praedial photograph adjacent obligee ought to help each other according to advantageous production, convenient life, solidarity, fair and reasonable principle, adjacent of correct processing photograph concerns. In this case, mr Zhao and Ms. Wang place stay of Lou Yu door model situation is special, two enter a door apart very close, at the same time when open easy happening collision, each other gives birth to block up, both sides needs to be in daily life comity, help each other, in order to avoid needless issue. Here premise falls, ms. Wang changes door sufficient attention answers when door of guard against theft, should not increase the other side to enter a door to leave close reach current inconvenience. Show what Ms. Wang installs to enter a door of guard against theft to wrap Bian Jikuan and tall, make originally narrow crisscross space is more cramped, the door of guard against theft of home of as a result Mr Zhao is all when open cannot smooth move. Considering door of guard against theft main function of Bao Bian depends on beautiful, width and height can be adjusted according to needing to make, and Ms. Wang needs to pay lesser cost to be able to be in what door of safeguard guard against theft finishs Bao Bian below the circumstance of basic function to transform only, criterion the appeal that Mr Zhao requests Ms. Wang to lest affect its to come in and go out,transform door of guard against theft has fact and legal basis, the court gives support. In the meantime, fall considering the situation that affecting other to pass through, the door highlights guard against theft to be not had at metope slightly by the side of the bag apparently undeserved, and by the side of bag of door of guard against theft of Ms. Wang home transform be not only demolish, bring a kind of way again, to avoid to increase the economic burden of Ms. Wang overly, the court requests Ms. Wang to be installation of door of guard against theft inside wall body to Mr Zhao, make its not the appeal of the wall outside tower above does not grant to support. In the transforming of Bao Bian of door of guard against theft, ms. Wang should be adjusted appropriately on the right side of Bao Bian's width and the height that highlight metope, avoid the guard against theft with building of Mr Zhao home door happening blows loiter, specific the principle write one's own ticket that transforms a method to be able to occupy honest credence by Ms. Wang. Finally, the court makes afore-mentioned court decisions.
(match a graph to originate network)
?
