Just now the net swims the social activity that see- - occurrence inside story of a plot of Sichuan literature award. Come for years all sorts of societies collect the first prize in the activity vacant, second-class award stays white, of dragon of black of third class award mind not strange strange phenomenon showed an iceberg eventually one horn, handsome daughter-in-law revealed ugly about, mean award is pulled come out corrupt photograph. In robot the composition that keep a hand touchs the instantly that living person tears in eyes spends at every turn, can is thing of innovation edition award piece strike the table is amazed.
Sichuan literature award is exposed to the sun inside story of a plot, does the director give a vice director decide on awards through discussion? 2018-08-20 08:49 essays / reportage / literature
Catch the whole lot in an action
3 years Sichuan literature award was released formally recently. Reporter discovery, with go to a Sichuan literature award is different is, outside saving website of writer society government to release an information except Sichuan, chengdu mainstream media maintained basically silent. After the reporter is interviewing a few writers, poet, essayist, great majority states result of current literature award lets a person astonish, put in certain cat be bored with, camera bellows operation is apparent, sichuan of the Communist Party of China of strong appeal saves period appoint wait for relevant department intervening investigation.
Platform make following combing from many angle subsequently.
Civil / Chinese south is artistic
The director becomes a commissioner to the vice director it is without evasive mechanism in decide on awards through discussion before appraise through comparison of this award of second Sichuan literature, sichuan saved writer association to announced measure of decide on awards through discussion external on March 26, 2018, be in clearly " method of decide on awards through discussion of award of literature of the 9th Sichuan " " discipline of decide on awards through discussion " the reputation in the process: "If the member that group of orgnaization of decide on awards through discussion grows up has work to participate, or the main controller that the relative of the chief editor of the library that place of the editor that fastens participating work, participating work belongs to or a series of books, participating author, participating work publishs an unit, should active and evasive. Relevant personnel can choose to exit orgnaization of decide on awards through discussion, or work is exited choose. Or work is exited choose..
Cut pursues as follows:
In process of real decide on awards through discussion, meeting doubt is like commissioner of award of literature of the 9th Sichuan to be violated badly compasses. It is among them in 5 commissioners of prosaic essay group, 2 visit writer association staff member to sponsor square Sichuan. Among them Niu Fang is " Sichuan literature " magazine party pays a scribe, deng Zijiang is director of office of association of Sichuan province writer, and there is Sichuan to save personnel of writer association service in participating author, did not execute evasive mechanism.
Bear the palm person cut pursues as follows:
Commissioner cut pursues as follows:
In result of decide on awards through discussion, xiong Ying (deputy secretary-general of association of Sichuan province writer) , Peng Jiahe (vice director of office of association of Sichuan province writer) in pairs bear the palm, this 2 average per capita visit writer association staff member for Sichuan, 2 are occupied in author of 3 bear the palm. That is to say, be in same (prosaic group) award in, sponsor square same an unit is same a generation in the branch commissioner and the person that participate, arrived even between fluctuation class the degree of decide on awards through discussion: Office director gives a vice director decide on awards through discussion, in the Peng Jiahe in routine the assistant that is Deng Zijiang, same office work. In the list of bear the palm that published on August 17, 2018, 2 people of river of the Xiong Ying of association of Sichuan province writer, Home Peng win an award together.
Result of decide on awards through discussion is not passed fair show reject masses to supervise
In the measure of decide on awards through discussion that in Sichuan province writer association announced external on March 26, 2018, be in clearly " method of decide on awards through discussion of award of literature of the 9th Sichuan " the 6th " program of decide on awards through discussion " the 4th medium " authorized " in regulation: "Committee of decide on awards through discussion refers table of contents of work of bear the palm the province to make assist chairman office can affirm, make by the province assist give after leading Party group is authorized fair show, report provincial Party committee of Sichuan of the Communist Party of China to publicize a ministry.
Cut pursues as follows:
Its " authorized hind fair show " one word in black and white, but announced external on August 17, 2018 " announcement of office of decide on awards through discussion of award of literature of the 9th Sichuan (2018) the 2nd " in, do not have at all fair show, also did not agree with late cloth in what pass upper section, disregard those who head office to guard a pass action, announced result of decide on awards through discussion directly, change " fair show " for " announce " . Default of leading Party group of association of Sichuan province writer is general show segment, reject masses to supervise.
Cut pursues as follows:
Office of decide on awards through discussion of award of literature of the 9th Sichuan was in on August 17, 2018 its government website " Sichuan writer net " go up to will do not have a course avowedly fair result of shown decide on awards through discussion announces: "Group of each expert evaluation is opposite award of literature of the 9th Sichuan fair already shown participating work undertook serious evaluation, vote via 3 rounds of secret ballots at coming 17 days on August 15, 2018, through be being judged eventually, authorized, produced 7 award work of bear the palm; Discuss by committee of decide on awards through discussion produced work of special award bear the palm. Make bear the palm sheet of the name of an article and committee of decide on awards through discussion, expert evaluate group, discipline now list of office of censorial group, decide on awards through discussion gives announce.
Not fair show time, not fair show supervisory telephone call, why does association of Sichuan province writer want evasive fair show? Why to accept wide swarm not actively in last segment to be supervised numerously? The official literature award with normal and earnest any must pass fair show segment (the award that be like cogongrass, rash award is waited a moment) , and Sichuan literature award disregards this one provision, steer clear of is fair show segment.
The just sex that increases quota of people of bear the palm to disregard decide on awards through discussion at will is in " method of decide on awards through discussion of award of literature of the 9th Sichuan " " award setting " in specific provision: "Award of literature of the 9th Sichuan sets award 8, a total of work of bear the palm 16: Novel award 2 ministry, medium short story award (contain short-short) 3 (ministry) , poetry award (contain word of old system poem, prose poem) 3, prosaic essay award 3, reportage award (contain on-the-spot record literature, biography literature) 2 (piece) , children literature award 1, literary theory comments on award 1 (piece) , literature translates award 1. Literature translates award 1..
Cut pursues as follows:
But, in the list of bear the palm August 17, 2018, author of 3 bear the palm appeared in list of reportage bear the palm. A these many from why and come? Why should increase a quota of people alone to reportage? Choose in large award in the center increase quota of people at will lawful? If increase quota of people to need to pass if whether increase quota of people to need to pass,explain external and fair show? Indiscipline is supervised? Same, any official characters that did not see Sichuan saves writer association show an explanation.
If appear,be in in decide on awards through discussion certain award win chosen case without work, answer to abandon handling, and cannot turn vacancy with other award. This Sichuan literature award involves many award, each award quota of people closes with fair, fair look, once decide formally quota of people of bear the palm cannot change at will, if appear special situation, also must announce a case external, make addition quota of people sufficient specification. But the fluctuant specification that did not increase quota of people in selection process of Sichuan literature award, also do not have any explanations in list of final bear the palm.
From inside the each commissioner list that publishs finally understanding arrives, this commissioner member is apparent discard Sichuan is a lot of and outstanding literary essayist, professor need not, do not discuss via presidium recommend a program, bring about commissioner team not to have public letter force, produced each award Xiang Zhongjun to discard actor chooses the case of bad directly. Ground of author be indignant says, association of Sichuan province writer did not think this award examine as a withstand, should get a public praise, government literature that leaves so that dirty tastes large award will do.
In the method of decide on awards through discussion of association of this writer of second Sichuan province, the person that sponsor alleges " Sichuan literature award is the literary reward that Sichuan province has highest honor, by Sichuan province writer association is sponsorred. Create fine literature work for incentive Sichuan writer, drive Sichuan literature career to develop great prosperity greatly. " really, this award involves the writer's honor not only, also because of bonus affect each interest again. The process of appraise through comparison of award of literature of the 9th Sichuan is put in flaw, supervisory mechanism exists in name only, selection process lacks just sex. Pardonable these days essayist of Sichuan poet author makes public doubt, doubt is like camera bellows operation, there is shady deal inside.
Will strictly tell, this also is a kind of corruption.
