Jin Yong is sued " here teenager " win the lawsuit, "Colleague work the first case " course of s

Jin Yong is sued " here teenager " win the lawsuit, "Colleague work the first case " course of study of to give way had adjudgement level (1616 period)

Business of source Piao entertainment observes article Piao Ke Ming

Sentenced!

Last a period of time two years, jin Yong sues Yang Zhi (Changjiang Delta) " here teenager " one case must adjudge tort eventually. Final Jinyong wins the lawsuit, the accused Yang Zhi needs compensation pecuniary loss is reached 1.68 million yuan to check the reasonable expenditure of tort behavior 200 thousand yuan.

Jin Yong is sued " here teenager " win the lawsuit, "Colleague work the first case " course of study of to give way had adjudgement level (1616 period)

And the court is right " here teenager " the copyright that whether violated Jin Yong also became complete explanation. The court thinks clue of the figure relationship of work, story and origianl work do not have similar sex, was to use name of origianl work part only, because this does not form copyright tort, also cannot saying is to borrowed. But " here teenager " the attention that gold of have the aid of needs the appeal force of work improved oneself work is spent, publish a volume tremendous got profit, made unfair competition.

This case is so-called " colleague work the first case " , in the hour of colleague work like a raging fire, the court decision irrigated a cold water to its undoubtedly as a result, allow the colleague creation that is the gray region at legal brim all the time, enter the field of vision of legal judge.

This case also rings alarm bell noisy for the colleague creation later, although work did not rise to copyright tort, but the original sin that unfair competition may become colleague to create.

And the immediate impact of this one case reflects in: Colleague work commercializes foreground to will sell at a discount greatly, website of article of range estimation net will have one wear below large quantities of colleague article, in order to avoid the ill will of tort.

Jin Yong sues Changjiang Delta

" here teenager " case beginning and end

" here teenager " be writer Changjiang Delta become famous, wrote 2001, related the campus story that the master such as Guo Jing, Huang Rong, Qiao Feng, Ling Huchong is in university of Beijing of another name for Kaifeng, it is the extemporization of days of Beijing University of Changjiang Delta memory only originally, did not think of one artillery piece and red.

" here teenager " was adapted 2010 the film, public praise is pretty good still, there are 7.5 minutes in fabaceous valve, achieve authors to did not realize tort deed right now. Teleplay copyright is bought by China plan, the newspaper had 2014 film put on record, but later did not film truly finish.

As a result of the likeness between character full name gender and " here teenager " have one's moment, changjiang Delta and " here teenager " entered endless lawsuit disturbance.

On October 11, 2016, jin Yong tells Changjiang Delta formally the court, sue Changjiang Delta to reach its to publish company tort, requirement " the action that stops to encroach accuser copyright and unfair competition instantly, stop to duplicate, publish a novel " here teenager " , seal up for keeping and books of inventory of destroy by melting or burning " .

On April 25, 2017, this case is tried in open a court session of court of Guangzhou city the Milky way, be called " colleague work the first case " . Around move colleague novel is invaded not the problem of tort also caused each to just discuss.

On August 16, 2018, forensic first instance is adjudged " here teenager " make unfair competition, think " here teenager " did not build the clue the base in Jin Yong work, not place of commonplace of enroach on gold enjoys some adapting authority, sign work of authority, protection is complete authority, but publish in books, the plan issues domain and relation of competition of Jin Yong existence, disobeyed our country to oppose unfair competition law.

Jin Yong is sued " here teenager " win the lawsuit, "Colleague work the first case " course of study of to give way had adjudgement level (1616 period)

Changjiang Delta also makes a statement subsequently, accept forensic court decision, say " because its get a name to get benefit, due this one disaster " , engaging in a lawsuit with God is not a happy thing really, changjiang Delta paid tuition for this, at affection at manage also ought to, complaint of it doesn't matter.

"Colleague work the first case "

Big to blow of industry of net article platform, movie and TV?

Colleague novel is to point to 2 creative work that the element such as clue of the character role in using work of original caricature, animation, novel, movie and TV, story or setting set has novel. It is with the network the novel is carrier commonly, the person that compose is the vermicelli made from bean starch of origianl work more, have research more to origianl work.

" here teenager " go-between content name is the familiar to the ear in novel of Jin Yongwu a person adept in martial arts and given to chivalrous conduct can the master of detailed, be considered as colleague novel, and author Changjiang Delta also professes is Jin Yong confusing, just want to lend campus of Beijing University of character role regain days.

Anyway, "Colleague work the first case " be in for colleague work for the first time jural established adjudgement standard, what can make clear above all is, it is to use name of figure of origianl work novel, place only, the colleague novel that does not have approximate sex on the clue does not calculate borrowed, do not form violate copyright.

But once gain profit accordingly, profit is huge, damaged the economic rights and interests of former writer, cause unfair competition likely. Come so, the colleague of platform of article of a few nets pays cost channel the likelihood is castaway, large quantities of one colleague wear unavoidable below work.

But as a whole, this case can not is opposite net article platform has very big blow, on one hand, colleague novel is not the mainstream of net article platform, although chopped this one, net article platform also won't have too big damage. Country's biggest net article platform reviews collected works group, subordinate start Chinese net has regarded secondary level directory as colleague, do not appear in home page, became however " 2 dimension " below " derive colleague " , and the sign that increases the platform such as academy of classical learning of sweet, Xiaoxiang not to see colleague in net of the Chinese that start a life, red sleeve, in the final analysis, feeling of black unreal, talk just is the main body of net article market, colleague enters old hall hard.

On the other hand, limitation of colleague work force is big, gain ability is weak, may be group of a rice only amuse oneself, become a big IP very hard. Resemble " here teenager " also was to catch up with the east wind with network arisen literature nevertheless, its success is not had can duplicate quality.

So what does this case have to affect again to work of colleague movie and TV? Will look at present, wait for work of broadcasted colleague movie and TV to have hardly. Of course, if calculate electrify shadow " love apartment " if, also be creation of colleague of press close to, just be inspected like you, this kind of attempt was scolded to give horizon, creation of visible colleague movie and TV is not denounced happy event.

Jin Yong is sued " here teenager " win the lawsuit, "Colleague work the first case " course of study of to give way had adjudgement level (1616 period)

What is more,the rather that company of movie and TV is purchased to IP especially careful, copyright consciousness also accentuates more inspect, aux would rather floriferous dot money is bought achieve IP formerly, avoid the tort dispute of in the future, also do not offend easily on tort lawsuit. And colleague work contains creation attribute inherently 2 times, do not be like achieve formerly that kind is dinkum, adapt on thin ice of movie and TV, take pain to not to please, generally speaking company of movie and TV does not wish to risk this danger.

Colleague creates degree be in?

Achieve an author to answer vigilant " hitchhike "

This nevertheless the case is opposite however the person that colleague is created rings alarm bell noisy, creation freedom is due degree, achieve an author to answer vigilant " hitchhike " " borrow situation " the unfair competition such as conduct propaganda.

Colleague creates degree be in? Work of two kinds of colleague won't suffer very big effect actually, it is vermicelli made from bean starch from hey colleague article, see normally at sticking, platform of article of circle of vermicelli made from bean starch, net, circle is small numerous, do not have Gao Zhi name to spend, it is the child that circle of vermicelli made from bean starch amuses oneself only, work of this kind of colleague returns to interest writing, and rather than is a purpose with gain, be helpful for the communication between vermicelli made from bean starch and agglomeration.

2 it is the colleague article that acquires an author to allow to create, the platform of former writer offerred lawful sex for colleague creation. Be like " rob a tomb takes notes " 3 father's younger brother are sent to express publicly to welcome colleague creative work south the author, then for a short while the colleague article of Wu Xie and little elder brother flies all over the sky. " haing Li Bote and cursed child " also be to be based on " haing Li Bote " colleague creation, received Luo Lin's authorization.

Of course, since have the capacity of framework story, it is the word like name and origianl work leading role merely, can change a name completely to undertake be achievinged formerly actually, in order to avoid needless tort suspicion.

Colleague work abounded literary creation, net article market flourished on certain level, but this case, be being commercialized to colleague work is one big blow undoubtedly, the person that create to colleague had caution effect, but compared with the regulation before not clear, this case made clear the bottom line that colleague work creates at least. Want not to tread this red line only, colleague work still has the space that continues to live.

Textual caption: Jin Yong sues Changjiang Delta " here teenager " obtain compensate 1.88 million, is colleague work commercialized at this point go no further?

E N D

Gangqinshi01 of ◇ of collaboration of company, project

Project, movie and TV publicizes cooperative ◇ Rene0602

◇ of playwrite broker business connection Zqy24680

Contribute ◇ Yunying@bianjubang.com

Already entered together be stationed in the following platform

Today's top headlines | Sohu from media | A bit information

Interface | Penguin media

未经允许不得转载:News » Jin Yong is sued " here teenager " win the lawsuit, "Colleague work the first case " course of s