After sueing a divorce, a lot of the accused often are special kink to divorcing at whether agreeing, and according to adjudgement convention, the judge is about to ask respondent above all when careful of first time front courtyard the opinion to the divorce. To this, the accused is cannot evasive, must make the meaning that whether agrees with a divorce express on the court. If the accused expresses to agree, criterion the judge can be in follow-up cognizance can put working emphasis in children to bring up break up a problem to go up with divorce belongings. Then, can go back on his word likely very much again in the accused cognizance in sequel, express not to agree to divorce then. To this kind of practice of the accused, is the judge still can consider the go back on one's wording that accepts the accused even opinion? About this problem, this divorce lawyer thinks and do not have very key, because right now judge wants to distinguish according to details of a case,the following kinds of cases maintain feeling of husband and wife integratedly whether burst, make final judgment.
1, both sides is litigant divorce the 2nd. As a result of well-known reason, sue a divorce the 2nd times to representing accuser to hope to remove the sturdy determination that marriage concerns, make clear both sides and do not have the likelihood of become reconciled, no matter whether the accused agrees,divorce so, also no matter the accused is right this problem whether contradict oneself, unless have extremely special case, for instance both sides still has a lot of can evidence of emotive of repair husband and wife, criterion the opinion that the judge basically won't adopt the accused, same court decision divorces;
2, both sides is divorce of first time lawsuit and existing evidence proves burst of feeling of husband and wife adequately, do not have become reconciled likelihood. Below this kind of circumstance, agree to divorce at first to the accused, go back on his word again next, the judge still won't adopt the opinion of the accused, final result or court decision divorce;
3, both sides is to sue a divorce for the first time and existing evidence can't prove feeling of husband and wife already burst. Think according to the experience of this lawyer, this kind of circumstance is most complex, base of feeling of the size of possibility of rehabilitate of feeling of the real reason that because handling the meeting when this problem to be expressed to agree by the accused,divorces, husband and wife, husband and wife is firm, it is the influence of a variety of elements such as judge adjudgement psychology even. Although express to agree to divorce,for instance the accused is in when careful of first time front courtyard, but the exterior element interference such as the agitate that also states oneself are to get father and mother at the same time, agreeing with a divorce is helpless lift. And be in next in trying a process, the accused goes back on his word again, think the expression before oneself is too cursory do not agree to divorce stoutly then. To this, the judge can adopt the opinion of the accused very likely, the court decision forbids to divorce. Because be certain,for instance the accused first time expresses to agree to divorce is bilateral feeling already burst, be not be forced to accept. Additional, the case has worked through many cognizance and investigation, basically already OK when end a case is adjudged, the accused ability because the other besides feeling goes back on his word not to agree to divorce again consequently formerly. This kind of action of the accused can bring about very likely the judge's allergy, then its are met and apply oneself to search reason to the understanding of existing state of affairs of love of husband and wife of both sides of former, the accused to adjudicate a divorce finally in order to support. This shows, the accused wants to obtain sufficient room for manoeuvre in divorce suit, need is had very tall should appeal to skill, there should be whole litigant strategy not only when facing divorce suit, foreknow ahead of schedule the situation that follow-up likelihood produces, even accurate hold accuser, and even the judge's psychology. Such talent is real have the initiative counterpoises, accomplish in lawsuit advance and retreat freelies, achieve oneself goal.
